They'll lose.
It will get "up to" jewtus and Kennedy will turn it down saying the family doesn't have standing. Or something jewish.
the difficulty federal courts are having balancing the First Amendment rights of religious people and the rights of gay people not to be discriminated against.
(((Foxnews)))
IT IS NOT DISCRIMINATION.
Plus you legally CAN decide NOT to serve ANYONE ever FOR ANY REASON AT ALL.
Title 9 (title 9 right?) is jewish, gay, niggery and unconstitutional.
Yup. Title 9 of the (((fourteenth))) which was forced on confederate states after the jewish bankers' (but I repeat myself) civil war.
Which was the singular goal of the civil war, which had LITERALLY NOTHING to do with slavery even a small amount.
They'll lose.
It will get "up to" jewtus and Kennedy will turn it down saying the family doesn't have standing. Or something jewish.
>the difficulty federal courts are having balancing the First Amendment rights of religious people and the rights of gay people not to be discriminated against.
(((Foxnews)))
IT IS NOT DISCRIMINATION.
Plus you legally CAN decide NOT to serve ANYONE ever FOR ANY REASON AT ALL.
Title 9 (title 9 right?) is jewish, gay, niggery and unconstitutional.
Yup. Title 9 of the (((fourteenth))) which was forced on confederate states after the jewish bankers' (but I repeat myself) civil war.
Which was the singular goal of the civil war, which had **LITERALLY NOTHING** to do with slavery even a small amount.
(post is archived)