it could easily be slippery slope.
"a laptop can run on 65W, so you should have desktops that are 65W or less"
"a phone can run on 1W, so you should have desktops that are 1W or less"
The goal of having a fully controlled OS like android/ios
it could easily be slippery slope.
"a laptop can run on 65W, so you should have desktops that are 65W or less"
"a phone can run on 1W, so you should have desktops that are 1W or less"
The goal of having a fully controlled OS like android/ios
could slippery slope
Don't. That's no way to view things. Just solve the (((problem))), don't pretend there's future (((problems))).
>could
>slippery slope
Don't. That's no way to view things. Just solve the (((problem))), don't pretend there's future (((problems))).
point taken.
point taken.
You didn't do anything wrong. You were just thinking too abstractly. Think in a direct manner.
Thing X exists
Thing X is bad
Let's solve Thing Y that doesn't exist yet rather than Thing X
Rather than
Thing X exists
Thing X is bad
Let's solve Thing X
You didn't do anything wrong. You were just thinking too abstractly. Think in a direct manner.
>Thing X exists
>>Thing X is bad
>>>Let's solve Thing Y that doesn't exist yet rather than Thing X
Rather than
>Thing X exists
>>Thing X is bad
>>>Let's solve Thing X
(post is archived)