Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

775

NOTE: faggot IS NOT a protected "class" of citizen. So all laws barring prejudice against a protected class do not cover faggots.

This is what all the jewish rulings SCOTUS has handed down that kikes have spammed as totally huge wins are hiding. I've broken down each of them in their respective threads. The US Supreme Court is no longer a legal entity.

NOTE: faggot IS NOT a protected "class" of citizen. So all laws barring prejudice against a protected class do not cover faggots. This is what all the jewish rulings SCOTUS has handed down that kikes have spammed as totally huge wins are hiding. I've broken down each of them in their respective threads. The US Supreme Court is no longer a legal entity.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (2).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Refusals should need no justification, no need to hide behind religion, no reason needed as to why someone was refused service, no basis for refusal that's not permissible.

If they don't want to serve you, whoever you are, for any reason, or for none at all, they should have the right to do so.

Because that's thei half of the contract, and they should have full control over all aspects of it, including (but not limited to) who they offer their part of the agreement to, what is being offered to them, and on what terms their offers are extended to them.

[–] • 0 pt

Refusals should need no justification,

They don't. People are making the mistake of giving a reason. Which is then where the (((charges))) stem from. Any business can refuse anyone services at any time for no reason at all. Just to refuse service. That's it.

These shop owners, when asked, need to just say;

because

And when pushed they need to trespass the individual.