As a U.S. Attorney, David Ketchmark prosecuted Child Porn cases under Impeached Eric J. Holder, Jr.’s Project Safe Childhood. Since we now know that Holder’s DoJ initiative names were the exact opposite of what the name implied, we can reasonably assume that Ketchmark may have been a part of some child porn ring
What does this mean? I don't doubt it but that's a huge leap and it just moves on without any supporting links. How is that reasonable to "assume"?
> As a U.S. Attorney, David Ketchmark prosecuted Child Porn cases under Impeached Eric J. Holder, Jr.’s Project Safe Childhood. Since we now know that Holder’s DoJ initiative names were the exact opposite of what the name implied, we can reasonably assume that Ketchmark may have been a part of some child porn ring
What does this mean? I don't doubt it but that's a huge leap and it just moves on without any supporting links. How is that reasonable to "assume"?
(post is archived)