What also struck me as odd is they don't have a transcript of the trial. He told jury to use their memory and they can't revisit any of the responses.
What also struck me as odd is they don't have a transcript of the trial. He told jury to use their memory and they can't revisit any of the responses.
That is because a lot of the testimony was contradictory. When you can show that none of the expert testimony is trustworthy then you can't convict on it. That is 100% done to favor the prosecution.
That is because a lot of the testimony was contradictory. When you can show that none of the expert testimony is trustworthy then you can't convict on it. That is 100% done to favor the prosecution.
That's very odd.
That's very odd.
(post is archived)