WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

841

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

I've got to be honest. I admire the mans patience.

[–] 0 pt

you would think they CO courts would have blocked any further suits, but this is a liberal mecca. 20 years ago, the assholes would have gone to jail for wasting peoples' time, but now they get to smear people over and over again

[–] 2 pts

Just change the business to "Cake Maker and Social Media Platform." Put up a cork bulletin board or something.

Or claim to be muslim.

Now try a Muslim baker.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Just had an epiphany, I am a Rastafarian Nazi. A jew baker must make me a birthday cake decorated with Adolph and Hailee Sallese sharing a joint for 4/20.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

who won a partial victory

Why are they claiming this?

Edit: Nevermind. Decided to read the rest of this rag piece.

However, the justices did not rule on the larger issue of whether businesses can invoke religious objections to refuse service to gays or lesbians.

Anybody have the ruling for this?

[–] 0 pt

It was a decision based on inadequate "process" and not on his right to not act like a normal business.

[–] 0 pt

ELI5?

[–] 1 pt

That consideration was compromised, however, by the Commission's treatment of Phillips' case, which showed elements of a clear and impermissible hostility toward the sincere religious beliefs motivating his objection. As the record shows, some of the commissioners at the Commission's formal, public hearings endorsed the view that religious beliefs cannot legitimately be carried into the public sphere or commercial domain, disparaged Phillips' faith as despicable and characterized it as merely rhetorical, and compared his invocation of his sincerely held religious beliefs to defenses of slavery and the Holocaust. No commissioners objected to the comments. Nor were they mentioned in the later state-court ruling or disavowed in the briefs filed here. The comments thus cast doubt on the fairness and impartiality of the Commission's adjudication of Phillips' case.

So SCOTUS found denial of a fair trial by the regulators, not that refusing gay service was okalidoaky.