When it came to attempting to explain these objects, the report gave five potential conclusions.
Man-made lightweight objects, such as balloons or plastic trash, which can be mistaken for a flying craft.
Tricks of light or water, with “ice crystals, moisture or heat fluctuations” being detected as a flying object.
Crafts designed by the U.S. government or private industry, although officials have stated that this remains unlikely.
Crafts designed by foreign adversaries, such as Russia or China, potentially related to advances in hypersonic technology.
We're not interested in any of these categories. We're interested in the category of flying objects that disproves all of these categories, the "other." Anything that can be dismissed as a balloon, sure, dismiss it as a balloon. The point is, there are objects that can't be balloons, or ice crystals, or secret spy planes, or aircraft built by other nations. That's the category that matters.
>When it came to attempting to explain these objects, the report gave five potential conclusions.
Man-made lightweight objects, such as balloons or plastic trash, which can be mistaken for a flying craft.
Tricks of light or water, with “ice crystals, moisture or heat fluctuations” being detected as a flying object.
Crafts designed by the U.S. government or private industry, although officials have stated that this remains unlikely.
Crafts designed by foreign adversaries, such as Russia or China, potentially related to advances in hypersonic technology.
We're not interested in any of these categories. We're interested in the category of flying objects that disproves all of these categories, the "other." Anything that can be dismissed as a balloon, sure, dismiss it as a balloon. The point is, there are objects that can't be balloons, or ice crystals, or secret spy planes, or aircraft built by other nations. That's the category that matters.
(post is archived)