Oh, the original link to the article? The original link is always in the headers of the Archived articles - see "Saved from ..." at the top of the page. You can copy/paste that URL into your browser tab to get to the source article.
Yes sir, that's what I did. Usually when I post a Archive article I also put the original link in the body of the post for expediency.
I was adding source URLs over the past few months and stopped doing it about a week or so ago. Given the hotspots to see Rumble, Twitter, YT videos and the source URL in the header, I decided it's redundant to add to the source URL in the post comment. Not everybody does it.
Is there some significant benefit to having a link in the comment when viewing on phones? I will start adding it again if the benefit outweighs the PITA factor.
IF someone wants to read the article,
IF they can't view a video,
IF they need the source URL
IF they are still interested enough.
There's a lot of IFs to make adding the URL value added in my mind. Maybe a good askpoal poll for poal.
Just the Pita factor, that is all. No big, I can handle it.
(post is archived)