WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

125

(post is archived)

This is related to a line of reasoning I employ with alphabet sexuality perverts: EVERYONE draws the line at "consent." For me to draw the line (or really, just promote the morality that God has revealed to us) at one man + one woman in marriage doesn't automatically make me wrong. You already admit there's a line!

Likewise the purge. You're (you know, the twitter person) all in favor of a purge. I just want a different one, which might eventually provide fertilizer for my plants.

[–] 3 pts

Funny how sex is the one time they go with the standard of consent. But our consent is not required to: - Levy taxes - Draft us into war - Use our tax money to officially discriminate against us - Import millions of welfare recipients - Force us to close our businesses for a flu - Force us to wear a mask in public - Force us to take a series of untested drugs by corrupt pharmaceutical companies

[–] 1 pt

Hey, I draw the line at consent also.

CHILDREN CANNOT CONSENT.

[–] 0 pt

That should be plastered everywhere in those fag cities. They’d probably rip them down like white lives matter signs