I didn't read that at all in his words. Your interpretation is an unbelievable stretch. He stuck to the facts. He didn't use emotional-only arguments regarding the facts about girls performing better in academic settings than boys.
He's successfully attacking the anti-white-male narrative that is pervasive in US schools.
I didn't read that at all in his words. Your interpretation is an unbelievable stretch. He stuck to the facts. He didn't use emotional-only arguments regarding the facts about girls performing better in academic settings than boys.
He's successfully attacking the anti-white-male narrative that is pervasive in US schools.
Read it again. Nearly every one of his complaints of "anti-male" is Because Female.
Read it again. Nearly every one of his complaints of "anti-male" is Because Female.
Read it again. He states the false narrative and counters with facts that show girls are superior in academic settings.
You should go back to reddit.
Read it again. He states the false narrative and counters with facts that show girls are superior in academic settings.
You should go back to reddit.
(post is archived)