I didn't say we'd use antiseptic measures.
Besides, cutting everything off will probably off them quicker than shutting them away at taxpayer expense. It would certainly be cheaper.
I didn't say we'd use antiseptic measures.
Besides, cutting everything off will probably off them quicker than shutting them away at taxpayer expense. It would certainly be cheaper.
I didn't say we'd use antiseptic measures.
Besides, cutting everything off will probably off them quicker than shutting them away at taxpayer expense. It would certainly be cheaper.
OK. That makes sense. Count me in.
>
I didn't say we'd use antiseptic measures.
>
Besides, cutting everything off will probably off them quicker than shutting them away at taxpayer expense. It would certainly be cheaper.
OK. That makes sense. Count me in.
I mean, I'm not against a good old fashioned Victorian Asylum, but we need to be mindful that finances aren't infinite. Modern Problems, Modern Solutions and all that nonsense.
I mean, I'm not against a good old fashioned Victorian Asylum, but we need to be mindful that finances aren't infinite. Modern Problems, Modern Solutions and all that nonsense.
Modern Problems, Modern Solutions and all that nonsense.
Agreed. I like the cost-saving aspect of your proposal.
>
Modern Problems, Modern Solutions and all that nonsense.
Agreed. I like the cost-saving aspect of your proposal.