WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

984

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Follow my chain of logic here…

The ONLY possible reasons someone would be against this legislation (or against Jim Caviezel’s movie, for that matter) are:

A) They are pedos B) They are traffickers C) Both A and B

Period.

There is no “middle ground” on this issue. No fence riding. No “let’s consider it from another perspective.” It’s really, really simple.

So, when someone says that it’s a “conspiracy theory” that there are pedos and traffickers in government, it looks like there’s an entire assembly in California to unequivocally prove them wrong.

[–] 0 pt

Yeah. She’s involved somehow.