Follow my chain of logic here…
The ONLY possible reasons someone would be against this legislation (or against Jim Caviezel’s movie, for that matter) are:
A) They are pedos B) They are traffickers C) Both A and B
Period.
There is no “middle ground” on this issue. No fence riding. No “let’s consider it from another perspective.” It’s really, really simple.
So, when someone says that it’s a “conspiracy theory” that there are pedos and traffickers in government, it looks like there’s an entire assembly in California to unequivocally prove them wrong.
Follow my chain of logic here…
The ONLY possible reasons someone would be against this legislation (or against Jim Caviezel’s movie, for that matter) are:
A) They are pedos
B) They are traffickers
C) Both A and B
Period.
There is no “middle ground” on this issue. No fence riding. No “let’s consider it from another perspective.” It’s really, really simple.
So, when someone says that it’s a “conspiracy theory” that there are pedos and traffickers in government, it looks like there’s an entire assembly in California to unequivocally prove them wrong.
(post is archived)