Many journalists see the glaring questions and evidentiary holes in the Paul Pelsoi narrative. But they also know how important that narrative is to Dems right before the mid-terms.
So why stick their heads up, provoke a liberal Twitter mob, and be branded? That's the climate.
This happened often during Russiagate: I got texts/DMs/emails from younger journalists inside big media corporations thanking me for being skeptical. They couldn't. One Twitter mob against them for questioning Dem narrative (see DashaBurns or BoKnowsNews) can be career-ending.
So they’re complicit in sedition just like the medical field with Covid.
> >**Many journalists see the glaring questions and evidentiary holes in the Paul Pelsoi narrative. But they also know how important that narrative is to Dems right before the mid-terms**.
>**So why stick their heads up, provoke a liberal Twitter mob, and be branded? That's the climate**.
>**This happened often during Russiagate: I got texts/DMs/emails from younger journalists inside big media corporations thanking me for being skeptical**. They couldn't. One Twitter mob against them for questioning Dem narrative (see DashaBurns or BoKnowsNews) can be career-ending.
So they’re complicit in sedition just like the medical field with Covid.
(post is archived)