I thought that's what they did already.
They do, but they’re also ranked members of the military so it causes relational problems and compromises discipline.
I agree with the sentiment. However, they can be useful in medic / recovery
Fair nuff, half hookers and half nurses. It only makes sense for prostitution in times of extended war and that's to swell the ranks even w/ the men sent abroad. It's strategy. Not misogyny. The women that can beat the weakest men that pass can be fighters. So like one in 100k if we use the fitness standards of just a few decades ago.
or to birth children. The old way the Nazi's did. If a woman couldn't find a husband she could get charity baby batter from a soldier.
source:https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/lebensborn-program
I mean, they are welcome to serve on the front lines. The enemy needs warm holes just as much as our soldiers do.
Her nose is huge. Look at the size of her face compared to the nose. very suspicious.
Yea, but she still has a warm and wet pocket.
![Honestly that's the only way women should serve in times of war. In backline brothels... the 'followers camp' as they would have called it in roman times [432x680 - 477KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/CHHudX.png){kind=link}
(post is archived)