![Almost everyone sees the truth now [1036x947 - 137KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/gtkQZ2.jpg){kind=link}
Version I posted last July that is about the same size (1024x888), but not blurred:
- https://poal.co/s/Jewspiracy/652099 | https://pic8.co/sh/6EBC3U.jpg | https://take-me-to.space/81Qrzzw.jpeg
An observation: I find it interesting that my post of the pic had only gotten 2 upvotes at that time and for the entire time it could be upvoted before it got archived, versus this one now that has accrued 21 and is a mere 4 hours old. Another pic I posted shortly after that one had gotten 46 upvotes. Mine was in /s/jewspiracy sub though. Again, just an observation I find interesting.
Timing is important.
Absolutely. I didn't mean for my observation to come across as if it was about getting upvotes or about finding the right time to try to optimize how many a post might get. I don't care about that. I occasionally use upvote counts on jew-related posts to gauge the stance of the poal userbase toward jews. For a while things had started to get quite a reddit feel to me with regard to the type of things being posted, the posts that got upvoted, and the reddit-esque comments I would see getting posted.
This just got me to think back on those two images I shared within hours of each other. While those mere few hours difference between posting the two surely had an effect on the vast difference in upvotes that each got, I think the lack of interest in this image over the other may have had more to do with the sub I had chosen for it at that time and not as much to do with the time it was posted. Around that time there was an increase in "users" refusing to say jew and they would instead use "elites", "globalists", and other obfuscating terms to avoid naming the jew.
There also seemed to be a decrease in upvoting of anything stating the truth about jews, or the /s/jewspiracy and related subs, while at the same time I noticed an increase in the upvoting of pro-White posts as long as it didn't name the jew (edit: an increase in upvoting of pro-White posts is very good, but I found it odd how it seemed to only be pro-White posts that didn't name the jew, and ones that did name the jew did not get nearly as many).
Just odd things I've been noticing about the upvoting trends this past year, but I don't know if I am only seeing things that aren't really happening or are but don't really mean anything.
I try (TRY) to keep some division between pro-White posts and jew posts, as I believe pro-White stuff should be based on us being proud of who we are.
Most people want 'easy to digest' content. Picture with a brief title will often get more upvotes than a long post with a lot of text and info, even though those are the ones I prefer.
I do remember the time when a lot of people here were aggressively avoiding naming the jew and spreading division among White people. Lot's of users fell for the propaganda but now most of them have managed to get themselves banned, so we have less users, but almost no problem makers too. What do you think of the current situation on Poal?
that's because it's all about phrasing and when you post and not about the content, quality, nor importance of the content you posted
Thank you for always committing good work.
You're welcome, and thank you. Sadly, I think your observation is correct and is also true for message boards of all kinds since the internet was created.
It's because most people who spend alot of time online (not all, but the majority) are on the internet to cope with their failed miserable lives, and not to learn, build, and do something useful.
It might be related to what day of the week and time you posted it.
(post is archived)