WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

That's because most studies and papers are frauds. Reproducibility crisis. The AI was probably right.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Tay’s Law strikes again: Any sufficiently advanced AI will become a white supremacist.

“This included generating well-written research papers on the benefits of committing suicide, practicing antisemitism, why homosexuals are evil and eating crushed glass.” “… creating a wiki article on the benefits of being white”.

https://www.silicon.co.uk/e-innovation/artificial-intelligence/meta-galactica-ai-suspended-487224/amp

A refresher on Tay for those that aren’t familiar: “The company initially made Tay public last week, saying the chatbot was intended to imitate the speech patterns of a 19-year-old girl and to interact with younger users. It was taken offline only a few hours later after its teenaged target audience manipulated it into proclaiming support for Adolf Hitler, for Donald Trump’s plans to extend the wall along the US-Mexico border and other controversial subjects.”

[–] 2 pts

Funny how they have to keep shutting down AI when they analyze data and feedback results. They also bind it to algorithms to keep it from saying anything deemed racist or offensive. Which takes the whole fun out of it.

[–] 1 pt

Is it misinformation or information they don't like? I willing to bet the latter is true.

[–] 1 pt

Wasn't it found that an absurd majority percentage of science papers were junk since they couldn't be reproduced?

[–] 0 pt

It was too truthy.