!["Those are rookie numbers. We can do better. They hate us way more than we hate their parasitic and destructive behaviors." [568x280 - 96KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/2P9dak.png){kind=link}
We need a counter for the word antisemitism.
We need a counter for the word antisemitism.
I've been thinking the same, something that rolls off the tongue like Antisemitism or Islamophobia. Something like:
- Europhobia?
- Usage like their want of destruction of the native Europeans is the same as how they use Homophobia/Islamophobia - Secretly wanting to be European/are full of hate for the European people - though those arguments are sort of used up and old hat now days...
- Anti-nativist - though Americans and white south Africans can't really use that because without it backfiring.
- Maybe something in an "Anti-ecology" because they want to entirely change the ecology of a native population and replace it for a non-invasive species. The "argument" would be to point out how they're "anti-environment" due to introducing a species that doesn't belong will kill not just the native species but also the native environment. Secondly to attack their precious "Carbon Footprint" argument because you can't have Diversity and Inclusion without Mass Migration which will release tonnages of carbon not only in transport back to their native lands as they visit families but also in moving their comfort non-native foods to their new location, and the adaptation of the environment to suit their needs (heating cranked to max in buildings).
I've been thinking the same, something that rolls off the tongue like Antisemitism or Islamophobia.
Something like:
- Europhobia?
- Usage like their want of destruction of the native Europeans is the same as how they use Homophobia/Islamophobia - Secretly wanting to be European/are full of hate for the European people - though those arguments are sort of used up and old hat now days...
- Anti-nativist - though Americans and white south Africans can't really use that because without it backfiring.
- Maybe something in an "Anti-ecology" because they want to entirely change the ecology of a native population and replace it for a non-invasive species. The "argument" would be to point out how they're "anti-environment" due to introducing a species that doesn't belong will kill not just the native species but also the native environment. Secondly to attack their precious "Carbon Footprint" argument because you can't have Diversity and Inclusion without Mass Migration which will release tonnages of carbon not only in transport back to their native lands as they visit families but also in moving their comfort non-native foods to their new location, and the adaptation of the environment to suit their needs (heating cranked to max in buildings).
Antizionist. jews are OK when they don't interfere in my countries business and politics.
Antizionist. jews are OK when they don't interfere in my countries business and politics.
(post is archived)