You can still see part of the dog in the altered pic.
You can still see part of the dog in the altered pic.
Where?
Where?
In the crook of what appears to be the right bottom leg.
In the crook of what appears to be the right bottom leg.
That's pretty good. Naturally the puppy could be faked with those marks carried through, but that'd be pretty lucky to have them match up well by chance.
If someone could just produce a higher-resolution puppy version (or zoomed out more) than the charred version we'd have pretty good proof.
That's pretty good. Naturally the puppy could be faked with those marks carried through, but that'd be pretty lucky to have them match up well by chance.
If someone could just produce a higher-resolution puppy version (or zoomed out more) than the charred version we'd have pretty good proof.
(post is archived)