WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

https://pic8.co/sh/lthrRs.jpeg https://www.gtvflyers.com/slavery-is-jewish https://poal.co/s/GoyimTV/661875

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

(edited this a few times)


This didn't seem familiar to me at all from the materials I am aware of. I checked through it all and did more research and checking and I couldn't find anything specifically about niggers being sold from this synagogue.

I also don't know of any instances and could not find any instances where kikes sold niggers directly from their synagogues at all as those buildings were not built in-port where sales of slave cargo primarily took place.

This synagogue in Newport, Rhode Island was built in 1763. This year is long after the importation of new slaves had *supposedly ceased in that area. According to "Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade to America Vol.2 - Eighteenth Century" by Elizabeth Donnan, there were no new niggers imported from Africa into Rhode Island after 1698.

Rhode Island - None Imported since 1698, by the Company, or Separate Traders. Their only supply of Negroes is from Barbadoes, from whence yearly they have between 20 and 30 Negroes, who are sold from 30 to £40 per Head, if sound. - Dec. 5, 1708, Governor Cranston to the Board of Trade, Cal. St. P. Col., 1708-1709, pp. 171-172, and this work, vol. III., Rhode Island.

However, some existing slaves from other locations were still brought in nearer to the time when this synagogue was built in 1763: EDIT I think I misread this citation as noting slaves shipped into Rhode Island, but I see now that it is actually saying that the captain of the ship is from Rhode Island just as the other captains are noted for where they are from.

Thomas Melvil to the Committee of the Company of Merchants. Cape Coast Castle, July 1, 1753. There has lately sailed Capt. Ellis of Bristol 260 Slaves, Capt. Walker of Do. 190 Slaves, Capt. Boats 2 of Liverpool 418 Slaves, Jepson of Rhode Island 150 Slaves, almost ready Yowart of Liverpool and Chillcot of Bristol. Trade is midling. The Ashantee' Paths neither altogether open nor are they quite Shut.

EDIT Despite that Volume 2 noted that citation of no new slaves from Africa to Rhode Island after 1698, that slaves sold after that time were existing slaves from other areas, primarily Barbados, in Volume 3 it makes notes of ships delivering slave cargo to Rhode Island with them coming from the coast of Africa. Many are cited from 1700 on through to 1807, but here are just a few slave ships arriving in Rhode Island from just 1763 when that synagogue was built:

Newport, Rhode Island January 31 [1763]. Since our last Capt. Arnold arrived here from South Carolina. The Brig Greyhound Captain William Pinnegar, of this Port was arrived there from Africa; also the Captains Freeman, Miller, Dolliver, and D avis from Boston; and Captains Larsher, Durfee, and Carpenter from this Port.

Newport, Feb. 14 [1763]. The Captains Eliot and Carpenter, also of this Port, are arrived on the Windward Coast of Africa.

Newport, September 5 [1763]. By a Gentleman who arrived here a few Days ago from the Coast of Africa, we are inform’d of the Arrival of the Capts. Morris, Ferguson, and Wickham, belonging to this port, who write very discouraging Accounts of the Trade upon the Coast, and that upwards of 200 Gallons of neat Rum had been given per Head for Slaves, and scarcely to be got at any Rate for that Commodity. This must be sensibly felt by this poor and distress'd Government, the Inhabitants whereof being at this time very large Adventurers in that trade, having sent, and about sending, upwards of 20 Sail of Vessels, computed to carry, in the whole, about Nine Thousand Hogsheads of Rum, a quantity much too large for the Places on the Coast where that Commodity has generally been vended. We hear many Vessels are also gone and going, from the neighbouring Governments, likewise from Barbados, from which Place a large Cargo of Rum had arrived before our Informant left the Coast, of which they gave 270 Gallons for a prime Slave.


It is possible that sales of slaves from both other locations (e.g. Barbados) or from Africa to Rhode Island were made at the time this synagogue was built.*

However, I believe the sales of niggers by kikes to other kikes (they were overwhelmingly the primary purchasers as well as the sellers) were primarily done at auctions held in-port immediately when ships were scheduled to arrive, not held at their synagogues.

Sometimes the auction was instead held at nearby jew banks while the ships with the cargo were docked in the port. This allowed for facilitating direct transfer and depositing of money from the sales and removed the need for storing and maintaining the cargo after its arrival until a time when they could be sold.

There was rarely a delay between the arrival of the jews' slave ship and the auction and sale of its cargo unless the ship arrival coincided with being a jew 'holy day' and the auction was postponed. The cargo was then held overnight on-ship until auction the next day.

Outside of port auctions for fresh arrivals, private sales were also done 'on-site' at jew plantations when they wanted to 'refresh' their stock. Sales may have been discussed and agreed upon while the kikes were at their synagogues, but I think the sales themselves occurred at the seller's home or at the bank where exchange of funds and goods would take place immediately.

This is only looking at the kikes' slave trading being done in North America, which was a very minor aspect of their entire operation. It is possible that kikes did sell slaves from their synagogues in South America, which was the core of their business.

This map of the transatlantic slave trade shows how many slaves were shipped from Africa to other continents:

North America accounted for only about ~389,000 slaves total for the entire period that jews were shipping slaves out of Africa. That is only about 3.6% of the ~10,703,000 documented slaves that survived being shipped by kikes out of Africa. Nearly all of the rest of that ~10mil+ went to South America, Caribbean, Jamaica, Cuba, etc.

Sales made in South America could have been conducted right out of their synagogues that I am sure they had down there. However, looking at sales of cargo from a logistical point of view, I expect auctions and sales were done in-port immediately upon arrival of the ships.

However, as such a massive volume of cargo was shipped to South America, I expect there likely were 'holding areas' for slaves offloaded from the ports due to crowded ports all offloading slaves. These holding areas would likely be a distance away from the ports and thus closer to any jew synagogues.

I think it is believable that sales of "overstock" being done directly at jew synagogues was something that may have happened in South America, but I don't expect it was something that happened in North America due to lower volume of slaves, let alone at this specific synagogue due to when it was built.

[–] 1 pt

Thanks for your great insightful comments!

[–] 1 pt

You're welcome and thank you!

To clarify; I'm not saying that slaves were not sold from this jew synagogue, just that I am not able to find anything to verify that they were with the materials and information that I am aware of.

It seems strange to me, though, that this specific synagogue was chosen for the image for the statement of jews selling slaves from it instead of one of their many other synagogues from that time. It being chosen makes me think that the creator likely had some information or documentation supporting that statement for them to decide to make this image stating that about this specific synagogue.

That assumes the creator was someone trying to share truthful information though, but then why not include the source for that information so it could be verified?

It could be that it was chosen for the image simply because it is the oldest of their synagogues still standing from that era and because it was made a national historical site.

As I hadn't come across anything about this before, and as I can't find anything to verify the statement (yet), I don't know if it is true or not, which sucks.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

It could be that it was chosen for the image simply because it is the oldest of their synagogues still standing from that era and because it was made a national historical site.

They most certainly discussed/negotiated prices there before getting to the pier to get their loot.

My guess is that they chose it to show people it was jews who were predominantly running the slave trade and owned plantations.

[–] 1 pt

Wow. I was expected a "nah I didn't find anything" not a full on research project. I appreciate the lengths you went through to look into this. Seriously - one of the best replies I've seen on the site.

[–] 1 pt

I'm glad to try to help. It was also a good exercise to help remind me of some information I had forgotten while also learning a few details I didn't know before.