WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

Sooo many daddy issues in that top one.

[–] 2 pts

The top one is genetically ingrained as the winning strategy because historically that guy would have kids with all those women. Like a polygamist without the incest.

We need to challenge that with the question "how many kids does he have?". That will wake up some people while others will expose themselves as sheep by challenging that with something like "not everyone wants kids". To which you can reply with something like "a mans value is calculated by what he does for the world plus what his progeny does. A man without kids is doomed to be a looser in the grand scheme".

[–] 2 pts

Muh dick nigger logic

lol Nay, the kids on the bottom will more likely repeat what they've learned from growing with a father and have more kids, while the kids born from the losers (top) will grow up without a father and end up being losers. It's factually proven.

[–] 0 pt

Muh nigger math. Having 10 kids with 5 wives and having 10 kids with 1 wife does not change how many fathers the kids have.

[–] 0 pt

Muh dick nigger logic part #2 - Idiocracy

lol Still losers.

[–] 2 pts

Sums it up nicely.

[–] 1 pt

A hoe will be a hoe as long as you can meet her price.

One proper wife and mother is worth more than every single hoe on the planet. Finding and keeping one is a treasure of immeasurable value.

[–] 0 pt

Are those mexicans?