Okay? Not only does this not show women through the decades, as it claims it does (lies). It shows nothing of a woman's beauty through these same ages. It carves out small, niche work that women did and clumps it in as work of a different type. That's not to say they should have been working, they shouldn't, they should have been at home raising a family and taking care of the home.
40% of factory workers.
The mail girls, the office girls etc. The numbers are intentionally vague and broad. I also doubt that 40% number for factory workers anyway.
Okay? Not only does this not show women through the decades, as it claims it does (lies). It shows nothing of a woman's beauty through these same ages. It carves out small, niche work that women did and clumps it in as work of a different type. That's not to say they should have been working, they shouldn't, they should have been at home raising a family and taking care of the home.
>40% of factory workers.
The mail girls, the office girls etc. The numbers are intentionally vague and broad. I also doubt that 40% number for factory workers anyway.
(post is archived)