A new law in Ireland criminalizes the possession of hateful materials. Then it shifts the burden of proof onto the owner, to prove his innocence in his scheme to "incite hate", whatever that means. When these laws appear in Western countries, pay attention, because such cancers spread. [10:32]

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

then shouldn't anyone with CRT material be charged? I don't know if Europe is as pumped full of this shit as the states. If not I'm sure they have their own version of openly racist, bigoted and in many cases completely false "information" posing as progressive material.

link

[–] • 1 pt

(edited )

There's nothing that can realistically be done about it, except not voting for them, and even then the other candidate has to win, needless to mention that you have to be irish to be able to vote over there. Anyways even if your candidate wins you'll probably lose whatever you vote they'll pass the same laws.

The only thing you can control is what you do and what you say, that's all. You may end up not being able to criticize groups of individuals, at all. Jews, blacks, muslims or whatever. So the question is how to continue to play, evidently, when such laws are enacted and you're concerned. Labeling yourself as a nazi or white supremacist, even more when you actually are one, that's not a great idea for a start. Why not label yourself as a terrist while we're at it... https://www.zerohedge.com/political/biden-and-dhs-secretary-claim-white-supremacy-greatest-us-terror-threat this is from today

Now if you can no longer label entire ethnic groups with racial slurs, and no longer blame them as a whole for this or that, you can still be accurate by being factual, use stats, articles, wiki entries, put them side by side. A statistical over representation remains a statistical over representation, it's not hate it's a fact. Now draw your own conclusion, you can even add a satirical spin https://vid8.poal.co/user/0k_/ROtG0T5 it's not hate

Yeah it's a tad harder yeah, Matthew 5:44... Especially when you aren't used to it

This guy isn't hateful for instance, he's just being factual https://vid8.poal.co/user/AOU/8I4DCVY

https://archive.org/stream/cu31924030480051/cu31924030480051_djvu.txt

12 BOLSHEVIK PROPAGANDA. IMr. SisroNs. Kerensky was spending a good deal of his time run- ning up and down the front, trying to hearten the B,u=;sian soldiers in their warfare, and he was generally accredited with being a fine orator and doing splendid work, and I do not doubt but what he did manage to keep the men longer than they otherwise would have stayed in, but we were told there were hundreds of agitators who had followed in the trail of Trotsky-Bronstein, these men having come over from the lower East Side of New York. I was sur- prised to find scores of such men walking up and down Xevslty. Some of them, when they learned that I was the American pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased that there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken Eng- lish showed that they had not qualified as being real Americans; and a number of these men called on me, and a number of us were imjDressed with the strong Yiddish element in this thing right from the start, and it soon became evident that more than half of the agi- tators in the so-called Bolshevik movement were Yiddish. Senator Nelsox. Hebrews? Mr. Siiiox'.s. They were Hebrews, apostate Jews. I do not want to say anything against the Jews, as such. I am not in sympathy with the anti-Semitic movement, never have been, and do not ever expect to be. I am against it. I abhor all pogroms of whatever kind. But I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that one of its bases is found in the East Side of New York. Senator Nelson. Trotsky came over from New York during that summer, did he not? Mr. Simons. He did.

It's not hateful, it's history, it's a part of the hearings of the overman committee

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overman_Committee#Bolshevism_hearings

The Overman Committee's hearings on Bolshevism lasted from February 11 to March 10, 1919.[32] More than two dozen witnesses were interviewed.[33] About two-thirds were violently anti-Bolshevik and advocated for military intervention in Russia.[34] Some were refugees of the Russian Diaspora—many former government officials[35]—who left Russia because of Bolshevism.[36] The overriding theme was the social chaos the Revolution had brought,[35] but three sub-themes were also frequent: anti-Americanism among American intelligentsia, the relationship between Jews and Communist Russia, and the "nationalization" of women after the Soviet revolution.

There's nothing that can realistically be done about it, except not voting for them, and even then the other candidate has to win, needless to mention that you have to be irish to be able to vote over there. Anyways even if your candidate wins you'll probably lose whatever you vote they'll pass the same laws. The only thing you can control is what you do and what you say, that's all. You may end up not being able to criticize groups of individuals, at all. Jews, blacks, muslims or whatever. So the question is how to continue to play, evidently, when such laws are enacted and you're concerned. Labeling yourself as a nazi or white supremacist, even more when you actually are one, that's not a great idea for a start. Why not label yourself as a terrist while we're at it... https://www.zerohedge.com/political/biden-and-dhs-secretary-claim-white-supremacy-greatest-us-terror-threat this is from today Now if you can no longer label entire ethnic groups with racial slurs, and no longer blame them as a whole for this or that, you can still be accurate by being factual, use stats, articles, wiki entries, put them side by side. A statistical over representation remains a statistical over representation, it's not hate it's a fact. Now draw your own conclusion, you can even add a satirical spin https://vid8.poal.co/user/0k_/ROtG0T5 it's not hate Yeah it's a tad harder yeah, Matthew 5:44... Especially when you aren't used to it This guy isn't hateful for instance, he's just being factual https://vid8.poal.co/user/AOU/8I4DCVY https://archive.org/stream/cu31924030480051/cu31924030480051_djvu.txt >>12 BOLSHEVIK PROPAGANDA. IMr. SisroNs. Kerensky was spending a good deal of his time run- ning up and down the front, trying to hearten the B,u=;sian soldiers in their warfare, and he was generally accredited with being a fine orator and doing splendid work, and I do not doubt but what he did manage to keep the men longer than they otherwise would have stayed in, but we were told there were hundreds of agitators who had followed in the trail of Trotsky-Bronstein, these men having come over from the lower East Side of New York. I was sur- prised to find scores of such men walking up and down Xevslty. Some of them, when they learned that I was the American pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased that there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken Eng- lish showed that they had not qualified as being real Americans; and a number of these men called on me, and a number of us were imjDressed with the strong Yiddish element in this thing right from the start, and **it soon became evident that more than half of the agi- tators in the so-called Bolshevik movement were Yiddish.** Senator Nelsox. **Hebrews?** Mr. Siiiox'.s. **They were Hebrews, apostate Jews. I do not want to say anything against the Jews, as such. I am not in sympathy with the anti-Semitic movement, never have been, and do not ever expect to be. I am against it. I abhor all pogroms of whatever kind. But I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that one of its bases is found in the East Side of New York.** Senator Nelson. Trotsky came over from New York during that summer, did he not? Mr. Simons. He did. It's not hateful, it's history, it's a part of the hearings of the overman committee https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overman_Committee#Bolshevism_hearings >>The Overman Committee's hearings on Bolshevism lasted from February 11 to March 10, 1919.[32] More than two dozen witnesses were interviewed.[33] About two-thirds were violently anti-Bolshevik and advocated for military intervention in Russia.[34] Some were refugees of the Russian Diaspora—many former government officials[35]—who left Russia because of Bolshevism.[36] **The overriding theme was the social chaos the Revolution had brought,[35] but three sub-themes were also frequent: anti-Americanism among American intelligentsia, the relationship between Jews and Communist Russia, and the "nationalization" of women after the Soviet revolution.**

link

[–] • 0 pt

Thanks for posting. It’s coming here eventually. The anti hate bill Desantis signed in Israel is just the first wave. First, no anti Jew stuff, then no anti black, etc. but the Jews will be first

link