I predicted all of this shit decades ago, I warned people, they looked at me like I was a loon. I knew politics would be increasingly polarized as fundamental differences magnified one side would get power during and the power struggle would use technology to hold on to their power artificially, if they lunged for that checkmate too early it would backfire tremendously. I found it much more likely the left would do such a thing than the right even then so if they leapt for the fetters of technocracy to bind civilization too early the right would take one of two forms either an a reactionary mob, or a well ordered machine resembling the nazis. I was 10 or eleven in a newly post 9/11 world when I realized all of this, at that time my hope was that the left would fail to grab on time or grab too early and that I could work as a mediating force on the right to prevent things from getting out of hand and spiraling into an utter totalitarian hell, the boot stomping on the face of humanity forever that Orwell imagined is what I wanted to avoid. At 10 I knew what niggers were, I loathed political correctness and censorship and while I could easily admit hitter like napoleon was a great man I still didn't know how badly I had been misinformed about history. I say all that to say that it looks like the left grabbed for power too early to finish clasping our technocratic fetters before all the fetters were complete, State digital currency and social credit are the final fetters they need, and integrated too many incompetents into their organizations, unfortunately it's a close game and the result of their technocratic suppression was an utterly fractious reactionary right mob, this mob could win if it would just stand up, but soon it wont be able to stand as all the boomers will be in wheelchairs and the left will have foreign armies in our lands. the further problem is that reactionary right mob is roughly as incompetent as the democratic leadership mostly through it's internal squabbling and producing insufficiently coherent and opposing ideologies. Too many on the right want a one size fits all solution, it wont work you'll have a resentful generation and we'll be right back here in under a century, we have to make a new rightwing ideology which is attractive to people today and that solves real problems and I haven't seen anybody leaving room for the disengaged to be left alone while tempting them it's all stick, with very little carrot. What we are missing is a uniting vision which isn't afraid to dream big while pursuing a fail forward mentality, instead it's all or nothing attitudes from people doing nothing noteworthy themselves while pushing off-putting purity spirals, that's not a condemnation of purity, but a condemnation of suicide pacts with unattainable goals. For the same reasons these men wont contribute to this society these same young men wont contribute to that society which a reactionary right mob is building steam towards. They understand that a future which intends to divest itself of them is not a future worth contributing to. In simpler terms, Why work for people who hate you? The new reactionary right are the same boomers and gen-x-ers who didn't understand the alienation of these young men when they were children. Boomer ideology and all of it's products failed, everywhere. boomer individualism, is as repugnant as critical theory collectivism these dynamics must be rejected if you want to bring these men into the tent, you then have to learn how to respect their individuality, make them aware of their need to address their own personal flaws while actually resolving societal flaws which dissuaded them from investing their lives into our society and make clear efforts not to see this problem repeated in the next generation. Essentially we can't expect the most degenerate chemically fucked up generation in history to become model citizens, we can try to get them to make the most of their lives for the promise of providing a high degree of opportunity to them and their children if they recognize the failures of the existing social order and the need for a better social order which is more sustainable. In simpler terms you may not be able to convince a smoker to quit but you can convince them to stop the next generation from becoming smokers, even support efforts to disincentivise becoming a smoker, maybe even convince them to stop smoking inside, or while pregnant, or exposing children and the public to second hand smoke. You must make some concessions to the addicts so as to get them to looser their grip on vice. The same is true here. Heavy handedness is important on occasion but generally it's unnecessary and counterproductive. The primary weakness of the reactionary mob path is that it doesn't even comprehend pro-social social engineering on the best days and on the worst days rejects it outright because of a false sense of virtue. The organized right, at the leadership level, needs to be structured and staffed by the reformed among the degenerates and drop-outs, not the ideological failures who have been occupying the conservative space until this point. I'm being a bit nebulous in all this, but essentially you need to harness the energy of the reactionary forces to bust down liberal technocracy and the people helming the reform need to be the white millennial doomers who got to see what society was once like before it became this, who were subjected to kike manipulation and over came and rejected it, but remained alienated, they are the group with the highest capacity to resolve the problem of the mass alienation of white men in society while preventing it from happing again.