WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I wonder why the Muslims came up with the nutty taboo against images of Mohammed? I mean, they all agree that Mohammed is not god. They call him a prophet. If he was just a man, then what's wrong with showing a picture supposedly like him -- of course there are no pictures of Mohammed, or statues of him, so it wouldn't be a real likeness, any more than all the portraits of Jesus are actual likenesses. But I don't see any reason for the prohibition, which is irrational and foolish.

[–] 0 pt

He may have been white with red beard

[–] 0 pt

Probably because he was an exceedingly ugly chronic masturbating pale freckled skitzo with dirty red hair and a gimp ... and totally not something to immortalize with an image.

[–] 0 pt

My guess is that there were multiple Muhammad's, so imagery was banned so any person claiming to be muhammad could be muhammad.