Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts

They also have changed the definition of autism more than once since the 1970s.

[–] • 1 pt

Yet their official accounting dismisses everything by simply declaring they are counting more people because they are measuring more people.

If you believe 1 in 36 (assuming number is correct) people naturally have brain damage, well the propaganda is successful for a reason.

[–] • 0 pt

It would be interesting to try and repair the data some how. Surely there are stats on the number of retards etc. that they now just classify as autistic.

In addition to reclassification, there is also a wide broadening of diagnosis, mainly to increase the potential market base for pharmaceuticals. This happens with lots of diseases that are "increasing rapidly". Basically, the underlying data is corrupted and can't really be used for any meaningful analysis because the scientists who were collecting it sold out in their ethical obligations to collect quality data.

That being said, the rate of "autistic screeching" level autism does seem to be markedly rising over the last 40-50 years.

[–] • 2 pts

Would be much more effective if it also trended the number of vaxx injections per child.

[–] • 1 pt

Yet, none of them can compete with Ol' Billy when it comes to autism.

[–] • 0 pt

It is absolutely vaccine damage but like ADHD is also a school funding scam to get federal funding for special needs kids so it is getting over diagnosed in part. Plus as the classes slow down for the mental capacity and disciplinary problems of a diverse learning environment, behavioral abnormalities are more obvious.