![It's all a distraction [584x272 - 44KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/3sivsw.jpg){kind=link}
No. No he didn't. He's being correct and necessarily specific while you're being intentionally incorrect and avoiding naming the jew for (((reasons))).
No.
No he didn't.
He's being correct and necessarily specific while you're being intentionally incorrect and avoiding naming the jew for (((reasons))).
((Reasons))
I guess it's antisemitic to call a Jew a demon, who'd a thought.
((Reasons))
I guess it's antisemitic to call a Jew a demon, who'd a thought.
double parens, not triple
lower case j
while trying to explain away his avoidance of naming jews
saying I called him antisemitic
- It's triple parens and you know this.
- 'j', not 'J', they aren't human.
- I never called you antisemitic, why the lie? Why the pilpul?
- jews aren't semites.
>double parens, not triple
>>lower case j
>>>while trying to explain away his avoidance of naming jews
>>>>saying I called him antisemitic
1. It's triple parens and you know this.
2. 'j', not 'J', they aren't human.
3. I never called you antisemitic, why the lie? Why the pilpul?
4. jews aren't semites.
(((Reasons)) because jews. If jews aren't semites then what are they. Actually curious.
(((Reasons)) because jews.
If jews aren't semites then what are they. Actually curious.
(post is archived)