WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

I think he believes that the Kantian irrationalist excrement filling most of the left side quotes is some kind of deep and profound wisdom.

[–] 0 pt

That's what I thought but tthr quotes on the right are from people who presumably OP wouldn't like?

Also the people on the left are brilliant physicists who are not saying what it seems on a superficial level when you understand physics in a formal sense

the people on the left are brilliant physicists

Yes

are not saying what it seems on a superficial level when you understand physics

Yeah they are. The Einstein quote and the second from Bohr are unobjectionable, but especially the first Heisenberg and first Bohr quotes are (1) in the realm of philosophy rather than natural science, and (2) extremely bad philosophy, derived from the work of the mystic and fraud Immanuel Kant.

[–] 0 pt

No, at the quantum level we see reality, objectively, as they are talking about it. Which, we should expect because these are the guys who created the math which more than 100 years later were still only beginning to experimentally verify as correct

Again - on the surface it seems like they're saying something they aren't, which is easy to confuse with other philosophical ideas. Unless you have several years background formally studying physics, you just can't get the perspective they're coming from