How else are you supposed to galvanize your vision for something better in accordance with nature? He wasn't perfect, nothing is, but he was heading in the right direction with selfless intentions.
edit - typos
I would say peacefully but with the capacity for self defense. I'm not absolutely against collectivism so long as there is choice, not coercion. I am absolutely against authoritarian states because they use aggressive force. I don't have a simple easy answer such as (((they))) hate fascism therefore we must become fascist to fight them. The Germans tried it last century and got smacked down hard and there was more sympathy for fascism back then.
I'm pretty convinced we live in a fascistic oligarchy and it demonstrates the problem. Any dissent is crushed, truth doesn't matter. You think fascism would work because people like you would be in charge and could sort this bloody mess. But we have fascism, its just that the people in charge are using it against you and it chaffs without remedy. You're like a commie saying that wasn't real communism, this time it will work .
I advocate for constitutional republicanism. The fact that the US constitution is being shredded, death by a 1000 cuts, shows me that that is (((their))) true enemy. I would be even happier with a republic based around ethnicity and a strong bill of rights.
An over simplification when you consider the history of Germany and it's geographical location. That whole region can never be without war, their borders are always under threat.
Authoritarian problems require authoritarian solutions, that's why libertarians are absolutely worthless when they acquire power. Principal and idealism and tolerance will have to be put aside because they are the primary means by which our enemies will destroy us. This is not a (((hollywood))) movie or a sporting match, there is no such thing as a gentleman loser in a life and death struggle. The right is reactionary and the harder the left pulls back on the pendulum the harder the reaction must be.
I can see a more peaceful solution in parallel systems that share elements of local geography in a common carrier capacity. I fear you are correct though and it will come to violence as leftists battle it out for control of an absolutist state as large as they can get through force and trickery. We must turn to Jesus and sell our cloaks
As long as the money supply is in control and run for the people and not a (((third-international-party))) for their profit, I believe any governmental system oriented around this principal could flourish.
I agree. It makes crypto currency very interesting to me. We need to stop accepting their dirty fake money that they can print out of thin air and have a system of hard money that protects communities not leave them open to exploitation. I believe the Nazi's revived the economy via work credits as money ie tied to something of real value. The monetary inflation of the last year alone shows how corrupted and disconnected from reality the current system is.
I think crypto might be the way
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coHC_9ApBdg
This is a good debate about Bitcoin vs Gold and it makes a strong argument for a crypto network being sound money which also protects from theft because you can have the key in your memory. No need for a physical representation. I don't trust Bitcoin per se but cryptos as sound money is a compelling argument to me
(post is archived)