Rejected jewtube comment. | Poal: Say what you want.

1.3K

•

white person exposes government corruption, and votes for the wrong candidate white person who is a star student smiles while being yelled at as he waits for a bus to take him out of a hostile situation, white person who came to act as a field medic shoots three jews who are explicitly trying to kill him with a skateboard, handgun, and baseball bat for stopping them from trying to light up a gas station, killing two of his attackers and severely injuring one, expresses extreme remorse afterwards white person has children with her partner, another white person, to whom she is happily married white person simply fucking breathes

An idiot: "white people need to all die out! we gotta kill all the white people! the world would be so much better if white people were all dead!"

career criminal, who victimized others all his life with violent, sexual, and property crimes, sold drugs and aspired to be a gangster, dies while getting arrested for a crime he had just committed, in one case while abducting someone else's children at knifepoint, in another while in the process of attempting to straight-up murder the one who shot him at the time he died

Same idiot: "Sure, he wasn't perfect, but no one deserves to die "

It's the same person saying both things.

2015: "humans suck, i hope some plague comes and wipes us all out"

2020: "OMG put your mask on! do you want to kill us all?"

Also the same people.

Attacks innocent people: "All cops are bastards"

Gets attacked in retaliation: ""that's illegal! I'm calling the police on you and you will be arrested!"

Yet again, same fucking people.

Don't get me wrong here, I'm no conservative or republican, I'm not saying you are inconsistent here, you aren't hypocrites, you've got the same message every time.

You hate white people, you want white people to be enslaved, or killed, or at the very least reduced in population and political representation to the point of being a people that may as well not exist.

You want to do whatever it takes to achieve these ends, because you were indoctrinated by ZOG into thinking this way, you are a cult that worships the death of a race of people.

That is, until the time comes when you yourself are attacked by some other race that you incited to hate you, and they are attacking you because you yourself are white. At that point, you show another layer to yourself, that you think you are some superior quality white person, and nothing like the rest of your race, who you condemn.

(Those fellow white people who you were just campaigning beside for the genocide of your own race? they don't count, only you, and you alone are this special snowflake that doesn't deserve to suffer the fate that you pronounced upon the rest of your kind.)

We know exactly what you are, even if you don't know it yourself.

"Racist" is an slur for white people, a racial epithet that exclusively applies to the white race, intended to produce feelings of hatred towards that race, including self-hatred when used as an insult for white people.

So yes, whites do know what it feels like to be called nigger, we get called the equivalent all the time.

We know what it's like to be hated, for more than a century, we have been insulted and sterotyped, we had heard calls for our deaths, and we had been lied about and lived in a society that had intentionally manipulated the public perceptions in order to incite hatred towards us.

Who commits the most mass shootings? bet you think it was white people. who commits the most sexual assaults on children? bet you think it's white people. who makes up the largest demographic of serial killers? bet you think it's white people. Who do you think controls the corporations? the media? the banks? I bet you think it's white people. who do you think is most likely to be shot by police, or be subjected to acts of police brutality/misconduct, or be falsely accused and convicted on the basis of prosecutorial misconduct,? I bet you think it's NOT white people. Take a look at the actual records, it's all lies.

They've lied to you, either straight up fabricated things, or selectively presented things in order to lead you into making the wrong assumption. Media execs straight up admit to hiding or playing down the crimes committed by Non-Whites, but playing up the crimes Whites had committed. If a nonwhite commits a crime against a white, they bury it or play it down, if a white commits a crime against a nonwhite, promote the story and they put it up for as long as they could, so as to create the illusion of an epidemic of white supremacist violence again other races, when in fact, whites are actually the victims of an epidemic of attacks on their race, for the sole reason of them being white. Because they are made up of people like you.

Juries are more likely to convict Whites for crimes then any other race, all things being equal, and prosecutions are more likely to commit fraud in order to convict whites than any other race. Because they are people like you.

Police officers are more likely to resort to unnecessary escalation and application of force on Whites, and are more likely to harass Whites than any other race. Because they are people like you, and because they know that White suspects are safe to not exercise due caution upon, because no one gives a shit about us.

It's not blacks who are the most likely to die an unjust and ignoble death at the hands of an unfeeling police officer, it's whites, the reason you think otherwise is because the people who work in the corporate media are intentionally trying to give you the wrong impression, they are lying to you, because they share the same beliefs as you, and so does anyone who would hold them to account.

Whites have been the primary targets of racially motivated attacks, been institutionally discriminated against to a point that even the worst levels of segregation couldn't come close to, and had been subjected to far worse treatment at the hands of the government then the black people of the Tuskegee syphilis experiments had ever experienced (where they were merely denied a diagnosis for a disease they had caught on their own, white people were intentionally infected with diseases so that the US government would be able to see the results).

*white person exposes government corruption, and votes for the wrong candidate* *white person who is a star student smiles while being yelled at as he waits for a bus to take him out of a hostile situation, white person who came to act as a field medic shoots three jews who are explicitly trying to kill him with a skateboard, handgun, and baseball bat for stopping them from trying to light up a gas station, killing two of his attackers and severely injuring one, expresses extreme remorse afterwards* *white person has children with her partner, another white person, to whom she is happily married* *white person simply fucking breathes* An idiot: "white people need to all die out! we gotta kill all the white people! the world would be so much better if white people were all dead!" *career criminal, who victimized others all his life with violent, sexual, and property crimes, sold drugs and aspired to be a gangster, dies while getting arrested for a crime he had just committed, in one case while abducting someone else's children at knifepoint, in another while in the process of attempting to straight-up murder the one who shot him at the time he died* Same idiot: "Sure, he wasn't perfect, but no one deserves to die " It's the same person saying both things. 2015: "humans suck, i hope some plague comes and wipes us all out" 2020: "OMG put your mask on! do you want to kill us all?" Also the same people. Attacks innocent people: "All cops are bastards" Gets attacked in retaliation: ""that's illegal! I'm calling the police on you and you will be arrested!" Yet again, same fucking people. Don't get me wrong here, I'm no conservative or republican, I'm not saying you are inconsistent here, you aren't hypocrites, you've got the same message every time. You hate white people, you want white people to be enslaved, or killed, or at the very least reduced in population and political representation to the point of being a people that may as well not exist. You want to do whatever it takes to achieve these ends, because you were indoctrinated by ZOG into thinking this way, you are a cult that worships the death of a race of people. That is, until the time comes when you yourself are attacked by some other race that you incited to hate you, and they are attacking you because you yourself are white. At that point, you show another layer to yourself, that you think you are some superior quality white person, and nothing like the rest of your race, who you condemn. (Those fellow white people who you were just campaigning beside for the genocide of your own race? they don't count, only you, and you alone are this special snowflake that doesn't deserve to suffer the fate that you pronounced upon the rest of your kind.) We know exactly what you are, even if you don't know it yourself. "Racist" is an slur for white people, a racial epithet that exclusively applies to the white race, intended to produce feelings of hatred towards that race, including self-hatred when used as an insult for white people. So yes, whites do know what it feels like to be called nigger, we get called the equivalent all the time. We know what it's like to be hated, for more than a century, we have been insulted and sterotyped, we had heard calls for our deaths, and we had been lied about and lived in a society that had intentionally manipulated the public perceptions in order to incite hatred towards us. Who commits the most mass shootings? bet you think it was white people. who commits the most sexual assaults on children? bet you think it's white people. who makes up the largest demographic of serial killers? bet you think it's white people. Who do you think controls the corporations? the media? the banks? I bet you think it's white people. who do you think is most likely to be shot by police, or be subjected to acts of police brutality/misconduct, or be falsely accused and convicted on the basis of prosecutorial misconduct,? I bet you think it's NOT white people. Take a look at the actual records, it's all lies. They've lied to you, either straight up fabricated things, or selectively presented things in order to lead you into making the wrong assumption. Media execs straight up admit to hiding or playing down the crimes committed by Non-Whites, but playing up the crimes Whites had committed. If a nonwhite commits a crime against a white, they bury it or play it down, if a white commits a crime against a nonwhite, promote the story and they put it up for as long as they could, so as to create the illusion of an epidemic of white supremacist violence again other races, when in fact, whites are actually the victims of an epidemic of attacks on their race, for the sole reason of them being white. Because they are made up of people like you. Juries are more likely to convict Whites for crimes then any other race, all things being equal, and prosecutions are more likely to commit fraud in order to convict whites than any other race. Because they are people like you. Police officers are more likely to resort to unnecessary escalation and application of force on Whites, and are more likely to harass Whites than any other race. Because they are people like you, and because they know that White suspects are safe to not exercise due caution upon, because no one gives a shit about us. It's not blacks who are the most likely to die an unjust and ignoble death at the hands of an unfeeling police officer, it's whites, the reason you think otherwise is because the people who work in the corporate media are intentionally trying to give you the wrong impression, they are lying to you, because they share the same beliefs as you, and so does anyone who would hold them to account. Whites have been the primary targets of racially motivated attacks, been institutionally discriminated against to a point that even the worst levels of segregation couldn't come close to, and had been subjected to far worse treatment at the hands of the government then the black people of the Tuskegee syphilis experiments had ever experienced (where they were merely denied a diagnosis for a disease they had caught on their own, white people were intentionally infected with diseases so that the US government would be able to see the results).

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

The idea that inherent genetic differences between racial populations is the best explanation for the difference in economic and academic success between the races is considered hate speech.

The only acceptable explanation, which has failed to withstand falsification numerous times, is that whites are to blame for the underperformance of other races, whether due to some specific actions we have taken, or, as more recent versions of the hypothesis propose, due to our very existence. Apparently this is not hate speech, since hatred is being incited towards white people.

You are told it incites hatred between the races, but the truth is, it would defuse them, blacks would hate whites less for their lack of achievement, and whites would hate themselves less for their superior levels of accomplishment.

It also explains why whites commit so few crimes compared to blacks, as intelligence levels and likelihood of criminality are very well correlated.

This is the real reason it is banned, not because it produces racial hatred, but because it reduces it.

It causes people to have less reason to hate whites for their race, and thus it is hidden away, under the excuse that it is hateful.

Tell me, if you accept that people with down syndrome are less intelligent than people without it, does that mean you hate people with down syndrome?

Tell me, if you think dogs are less intelligent than humans, does that mean you hate dogs?

The whole idea that accepting the cognitive limitations of others produces hatred towards them is completely absurd, and the only way people could accept such a ridiculous premise is if they have some alternative reason to ignore the flaws in this assumption.

such as an almost religious belief that white people are an evil to be exterminated, a central dogma that needs justifications in order to rationalize itself as not being the product of indoctrination, but of reason.

Like you see in any cult, they will shut down their critical faculties to swallow lies and absurdities in order to tell themselves that the ideology they had been programmed with, was actually something they believed in for good reasons.

An accurate description of our society's whole prevailing culture is that it centers around a intense religious hatred of white people. it's a religion without a God, but with a very clear Devil. White people are psychologically manipulated from birth to welcome the annihilation of their own kind, and they are fed a steady diet of ignorance, lies, deception, and misinformation in order to produce this hate in them.

Then you are programmed to deny that they are the products of an ideology of hate, by telling yourself that they are the followers of a religion of love, to discriminate against whites, and then lie to yourself that you love everyone equally.

The whole narrative is based on a deliberate (over) half-century long campaign of ignorance, half-truths, and lies, specifically designed to make you hate white people.

it's worse for us, because we are denied the one thing all other races have, the freedom to openly acknowledge that we are being attacked for our race, even in the lowest depths of a race experiencing persecution, they had that one freedom, to recognize that they were victims, to be forced to call yourself a perpetrator, and know that you are a victim, it is a torment so great that I simply cannot describe the anguish that results from it.

It's also worse for us in that for every crime the ancestors of white people have been attacked for, not only had they suffered the exact same kind of oppression from other races, and other races had been outclassing whites in it in every way.

Black Slavery in America was nothing compared to what the white slaves experienced in Africa and the middle east, where they were kidnapped from their homes on coastal Europe, brought south, males castrated, women were sex slaves, and the treatment they experienced was worse than anything a black had ever experienced in America, the Barbary slave trade began before the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, and ended afterwards.

White people's occupation of Africa or Oceania was nothing compared to the Ottoman occupation of Southern Europe, where whites were being actively slaughtered for over 400 years until the first crusade began. In that time, they had suffered multiple forms of genocide, lived as non-persons under arab rule, even if they converted, a large quantity of them were kept as slaves in their own homelands by a foreign power. The colonial period was nothing by comparison, the treatment was better, and in the case of Africa, the occupation was far shorter, and in Australia, the occupation was mainly whites settling down in colonies on lands the Aboriginals had not settled in, then being attacked by them, then fighting back when they were attacked, when talking about the horrors of that period, people tend to leave out how in most cases, it was the dark-skinned people who were the initial aggressors.

Whites are shamed for the colonization of America and the mistreatment of the natives, the first rebuttal was the same as in Australia, that the whites were not the aggressors, and merely responding in self-defense to attacks made on them by natives after they had built successful colonies in areas that the natives where not settled in, also areas which had been fought over by natives for pretty much all the history of the region before the white man came. But the new rebuttal is that which originates from "new" (censored) discoveries made in archeology.

whites were the first people to live in the Americas, there were people to came from Europe and had settled there, and were in the Americas for thousands of years before the first ancestor of the amerindians arrived from Siberia, then the European-originated people were killed off by the amerindians. So when the white man came on ships to the coasts of America, and started taking land there, they were not stealing it from the indians, the indians had stolen it from them, what the pilgrims and conquistadors were doing, was taking the land that was stolen from them, back from the thieves.

Same applies to the crusades, while the first crusades were a justified response to Muslim occupation and the atrocities performed on Europeans by them, the campaigns that followed, to reclaim the holy land, were said to be unjust, because if you hate white people, any time a white person harms one of another race, it's unjustified, no matter the reasons why. The genetic information we have had leaked out from mummies tested in labs reveals confirmation of what was long suspected, but never said, in Egyptian archeology. The indigenous Egyptian population was White people, more closely related to Western Europeans than to modern day inhabitants of the North African region.

Blacks were the orchestrators of the most successful campaign of genocide n human history, because they went from a small tribe on the coast of West Africa, to the kind of people you think of when you think of Native African People, they did this by killing, raping, enslaving, and even eating other African peoples across the continent, displacing them from their homelands, and generally doing the whole "kill anyone who looks different from you" thing in such a manner that white people had never even attempted.

They did look different, Africa is huge, with various environments and a lot of geographic solation, thus the people of the continent all formed into different groups that all had physical traits that would easily allow anyone to distinguish them from each other, these would be races, if they weren't arbitrarily considered to be ethnicities, the black people we know best came from zulu-bantu ancestry, which now dominated the continent, and they dominated the continent by killing off people who looked different from them, worse, these genocidal maniacs openly thought that the other African peoples weren't worth considering as even being human.

They zulu-bantu were the most successful genociders because they straight up exterminated multiple physically-distinct groups of people, having succeeded in wiping multiple target races out, not even the worst stories of Hitler and his Nazis could compare, because in each tale, they failed to exterminate even a single ethnic group.

As for how we know of the races that the Bantu wiped out, we only got to know of them recently, through the remnants of the ancestral DNA found in modern Africans. for most of these groups that got exterminated, we don't know what they looked like, though they would have looked different to their killers, we don't know what culture they would have had, we don't even know what they called themselves, we only know them as some alphanumeric designation of their genetic population.

The blacks of Africa have no right to complain about the Trans-Atlantic clave trade, after all, they were a part of it, the instigators of it, in fact, they were the ones who captured the slaves and made them slaves from free men in the first place, and they were the ones who sold them to the jews who ran the slave ships.

Your history books are carefully edited to excise all mention of the crimes committed by the ancestors of other races towards people of other racial groups, because if they were included, then whites would look morally superior by comparison.

What you call "racism" has so many meanings that most people have to guess what you mean when you use the word.

it can means so many things about someone, and could also mean the exact opposite about the same person, and it could mean that the person has yet another trait that sits between the two extremes.

Racists can hate other races, or they can be against hate for other races. Racists can be violent or against violence. Racists can believe in racial superiority, or they can oppose the idea. Racists can want to force racial separation, or not want to merely allow individuals to choose their own associations, and establish them on a voluntary basis. Racists can even be anti-racists who aren't sufficiently anti-racist, or be an egalitarian or meritocrat. Racists can be so accidentally or intentionally. Looking at someone can be racist, farting can be racist, sleeping can be racist, merely being in the presence of someone else can be racist, you can also be racist if someone simply accuses you of it, or assumes that you are for no reason at all, except that you are white. Racists can be pretty much anyone who is white, and it is for any reason a white person can be called a racist, "racism" is a meaningless word that describes such a ridiculously broad range of positions, that in most cases where it is used, the majority of listeners can only guess as to what someone means by "racist" or "racism", and they often guess the worst form they can think of. The one unifying factor is that racists are white, and that anti-racism is hating white people.

"racism" is just the act of existing while being white, for half a century, our race has been our crime, and "racist" is just a word for stirring up hate towards a particular white person or group of white people.

So why should whites strive to be anything else but a racist? it's a hopeless cause, as even "allies" are racists who must be purged.

The real ask is this, where is the benefit in not being racist? What possible upsides can whites get in exchange for becoming "allies"?

i see none, the relationship between whites and other races is not downright abusive, it resembles a marriage between a wife and a wife-beater, where white people are abused and made to see themselves as the ones at fault.

We are abused in every way by everyone, and then we are slandered as the perpetrators, the ones at fault for the failings of others, when we are willing to do anything in order to help them succeed, we want other races to succeed, because then maybe the abuse will stop, other races don't want to succeed, because they can live off whites, and if they were successful, the abuse might stop.

White Nationalism is the equivalent of asking for a divorce, the marriage is not working, and at least some white people are not willing to be abused anymore, most White Nationalists are presenting peaceful and voluntary options for the terms of the divorce, they are even willing to accept a deal that hurts them greatly and benefits non-whites just as greatly, if only they can get away from the abuse that is heaped upon them for their race.

Some White Nationalists are getting to the point where compassion dries up and then they stop caring about the terms, they just want the split to happen. Your goal is that the abused spouse dies by the hands of their abuser, so you are pushing them to this point, because your goal is only the destruction of their race, you are a genocidal aspirant, the fact that you are of the same race that you wish to butcher is inconsequential.

The idea that inherent genetic differences between racial populations is the best explanation for the difference in economic and academic success between the races is considered hate speech. The only acceptable explanation, which has failed to withstand falsification numerous times, is that whites are to blame for the underperformance of other races, whether due to some specific actions we have taken, or, as more recent versions of the hypothesis propose, due to our very existence. Apparently this is not hate speech, since hatred is being incited towards white people. You are told it incites hatred between the races, but the truth is, it would defuse them, blacks would hate whites less for their lack of achievement, and whites would hate themselves less for their superior levels of accomplishment. It also explains why whites commit so few crimes compared to blacks, as intelligence levels and likelihood of criminality are very well correlated. This is the real reason it is banned, not because it produces racial hatred, but because it reduces it. It causes people to have less reason to hate whites for their race, and thus it is hidden away, under the excuse that it is hateful. Tell me, if you accept that people with down syndrome are less intelligent than people without it, does that mean you hate people with down syndrome? Tell me, if you think dogs are less intelligent than humans, does that mean you hate dogs? The whole idea that accepting the cognitive limitations of others produces hatred towards them is completely absurd, and the only way people could accept such a ridiculous premise is if they have some alternative reason to ignore the flaws in this assumption. such as an almost religious belief that white people are an evil to be exterminated, a central dogma that needs justifications in order to rationalize itself as not being the product of indoctrination, but of reason. Like you see in any cult, they will shut down their critical faculties to swallow lies and absurdities in order to tell themselves that the ideology they had been programmed with, was actually something they believed in for good reasons. An accurate description of our society's whole prevailing culture is that it centers around a intense religious hatred of white people. it's a religion without a God, but with a very clear Devil. White people are psychologically manipulated from birth to welcome the annihilation of their own kind, and they are fed a steady diet of ignorance, lies, deception, and misinformation in order to produce this hate in them. Then you are programmed to deny that they are the products of an ideology of hate, by telling yourself that they are the followers of a religion of love, to discriminate against whites, and then lie to yourself that you love everyone equally. The whole narrative is based on a deliberate (over) half-century long campaign of ignorance, half-truths, and lies, specifically designed to make you hate white people. it's worse for us, because we are denied the one thing all other races have, the freedom to openly acknowledge that we are being attacked for our race, even in the lowest depths of a race experiencing persecution, they had that one freedom, to recognize that they were victims, to be forced to call yourself a perpetrator, and know that you are a victim, it is a torment so great that I simply cannot describe the anguish that results from it. It's also worse for us in that for every crime the ancestors of white people have been attacked for, not only had they suffered the exact same kind of oppression from other races, and other races had been outclassing whites in it in every way. Black Slavery in America was nothing compared to what the white slaves experienced in Africa and the middle east, where they were kidnapped from their homes on coastal Europe, brought south, males castrated, women were sex slaves, and the treatment they experienced was worse than anything a black had ever experienced in America, the Barbary slave trade began before the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, and ended afterwards. White people's occupation of Africa or Oceania was nothing compared to the Ottoman occupation of Southern Europe, where whites were being actively slaughtered for over 400 years until the first crusade began. In that time, they had suffered multiple forms of genocide, lived as non-persons under arab rule, even if they converted, a large quantity of them were kept as slaves in their own homelands by a foreign power. The colonial period was nothing by comparison, the treatment was better, and in the case of Africa, the occupation was far shorter, and in Australia, the occupation was mainly whites settling down in colonies on lands the Aboriginals had not settled in, then being attacked by them, then fighting back when they were attacked, when talking about the horrors of that period, people tend to leave out how in most cases, it was the dark-skinned people who were the initial aggressors. Whites are shamed for the colonization of America and the mistreatment of the natives, the first rebuttal was the same as in Australia, that the whites were not the aggressors, and merely responding in self-defense to attacks made on them by natives after they had built successful colonies in areas that the natives where not settled in, also areas which had been fought over by natives for pretty much all the history of the region before the white man came. But the new rebuttal is that which originates from "new" (censored) discoveries made in archeology. whites were the first people to live in the Americas, there were people to came from Europe and had settled there, and were in the Americas for thousands of years before the first ancestor of the amerindians arrived from Siberia, then the European-originated people were killed off by the amerindians. So when the white man came on ships to the coasts of America, and started taking land there, they were not stealing it from the indians, the indians had stolen it from them, what the pilgrims and conquistadors were doing, was taking the land that was stolen from them, back from the thieves. Same applies to the crusades, while the first crusades were a justified response to Muslim occupation and the atrocities performed on Europeans by them, the campaigns that followed, to reclaim the holy land, were said to be unjust, because if you hate white people, any time a white person harms one of another race, it's unjustified, no matter the reasons why. The genetic information we have had leaked out from mummies tested in labs reveals confirmation of what was long suspected, but never said, in Egyptian archeology. The indigenous Egyptian population was White people, more closely related to Western Europeans than to modern day inhabitants of the North African region. Blacks were the orchestrators of the most successful campaign of genocide n human history, because they went from a small tribe on the coast of West Africa, to the kind of people you think of when you think of Native African People, they did this by killing, raping, enslaving, and even eating other African peoples across the continent, displacing them from their homelands, and generally doing the whole "kill anyone who looks different from you" thing in such a manner that white people had never even attempted. They did look different, Africa is huge, with various environments and a lot of geographic solation, thus the people of the continent all formed into different groups that all had physical traits that would easily allow anyone to distinguish them from each other, these would be races, if they weren't arbitrarily considered to be ethnicities, the black people we know best came from zulu-bantu ancestry, which now dominated the continent, and they dominated the continent by killing off people who looked different from them, worse, these genocidal maniacs openly thought that the other African peoples weren't worth considering as even being human. They zulu-bantu were the most successful genociders because they straight up exterminated multiple physically-distinct groups of people, having succeeded in wiping multiple target races out, not even the worst stories of Hitler and his Nazis could compare, because in each tale, they failed to exterminate even a single ethnic group. As for how we know of the races that the Bantu wiped out, we only got to know of them recently, through the remnants of the ancestral DNA found in modern Africans. for most of these groups that got exterminated, we don't know what they looked like, though they would have looked different to their killers, we don't know what culture they would have had, we don't even know what they called themselves, we only know them as some alphanumeric designation of their genetic population. The blacks of Africa have no right to complain about the Trans-Atlantic clave trade, after all, they were a part of it, the instigators of it, in fact, they were the ones who captured the slaves and made them slaves from free men in the first place, and they were the ones who sold them to the jews who ran the slave ships. Your history books are carefully edited to excise all mention of the crimes committed by the ancestors of other races towards people of other racial groups, because if they were included, then whites would look morally superior by comparison. What you call "racism" has so many meanings that most people have to guess what you mean when you use the word. it can means so many things about someone, and could also mean the exact opposite about the same person, and it could mean that the person has yet another trait that sits between the two extremes. Racists can hate other races, or they can be against hate for other races. Racists can be violent or against violence. Racists can believe in racial superiority, or they can oppose the idea. Racists can want to force racial separation, or not want to merely allow individuals to choose their own associations, and establish them on a voluntary basis. Racists can even be anti-racists who aren't sufficiently anti-racist, or be an egalitarian or meritocrat. Racists can be so accidentally or intentionally. Looking at someone can be racist, farting can be racist, sleeping can be racist, merely being in the presence of someone else can be racist, you can also be racist if someone simply accuses you of it, or assumes that you are for no reason at all, except that you are white. Racists can be pretty much anyone who is white, and it is for any reason a white person can be called a racist, "racism" is a meaningless word that describes such a ridiculously broad range of positions, that in most cases where it is used, the majority of listeners can only guess as to what someone means by "racist" or "racism", and they often guess the worst form they can think of. The one unifying factor is that racists are white, and that anti-racism is hating white people. "racism" is just the act of existing while being white, for half a century, our race has been our crime, and "racist" is just a word for stirring up hate towards a particular white person or group of white people. So why should whites strive to be anything else but a racist? it's a hopeless cause, as even "allies" are racists who must be purged. The real ask is this, where is the benefit in not being racist? What possible upsides can whites get in exchange for becoming "allies"? i see none, the relationship between whites and other races is not downright abusive, it resembles a marriage between a wife and a wife-beater, where white people are abused and made to see themselves as the ones at fault. We are abused in every way by everyone, and then we are slandered as the perpetrators, the ones at fault for the failings of others, when we are willing to do anything in order to help them succeed, we want other races to succeed, because then maybe the abuse will stop, other races don't want to succeed, because they can live off whites, and if they were successful, the abuse might stop. White Nationalism is the equivalent of asking for a divorce, the marriage is not working, and at least some white people are not willing to be abused anymore, most White Nationalists are presenting peaceful and voluntary options for the terms of the divorce, they are even willing to accept a deal that hurts them greatly and benefits non-whites just as greatly, if only they can get away from the abuse that is heaped upon them for their race. Some White Nationalists are getting to the point where compassion dries up and then they stop caring about the terms, they just want the split to happen. Your goal is that the abused spouse dies by the hands of their abuser, so you are pushing them to this point, because your goal is only the destruction of their race, you are a genocidal aspirant, the fact that you are of the same race that you wish to butcher is inconsequential.

link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Watch Chauvin Trial One-sided curb-stomping, Obvious verdict is "not guilty" on all charges. Or it would be, if the whole thing was not being affected by open threats of rioting if the defense doesn't get the verdict they want, which is "guilty" on all charges, with recent memories of the utter hell on Earth that was the riots that occurred last time. And if the jury wasn't doxxed by corporate media agencies who are known to be thoroughly corrupt and threatening to give out their identities to people who would hurt them and their loved on should they not get the verdict that they s clearly want, which is "guilty" on all charges. And if members of government weren't calling for the blood of those involved n the case, such as the judge, should they not rule "guilty" on all charges, basically "send an innocent to jail, or lose your entire livelihood, at the very least, and deal with us abusing out power to making your life as miserable as we could, and possibly even arranging a premature end to it". But the trial is one-sided, on the side of the defense, the reality of how a honest and reasonable and non-coerced jury would rule after such a trial is "not guilty" on all charges. Prosecution is clearly knowledgeable that no one is holding them to account for any misconduct they engage in, they emotionally manipulate the jury, they present perjurous testimony, submit evidence that was modified due to political pressure, basically pull all manner of bullshit that they shouldn't have been allowed to get away with, I'm thinking to show off just how openly dishonest they could be. Defense are pussies, they don't challenge any of this stuff, probably because it's well known that the whole court system is rigged against them. Nevertheless, the whole case of the prosecution is convincing, until the defense gets to poke holes in it, and the whole case against former officer Chauvin just totally fucking collapses. It's like seeing an intelligent design apologist giving a moving and convincing speech on why Evolution and the Big Bang Cosmology is not scientifically justified, then seeing the Evolution side completely shatter their whole case, and make such a counter-attack, that you realize that the only way the "team design" guys could have won was either by speaking in the absence of opposition, or, as in this case, by rigging the whole contest through means of coercion or corruption, like in this case, through threats and intimidation where violence is on the menu should the result not be ruled in their favor. So you see a court trial where the verdict is clearly one way, but due to the intimidation and corruption surrounding it, the opposite verdict is ruled. It's OJ Simpson all over again. White people are gradually beginning to hate jews, and blacks, and arabs, and hispanics, they were under constant attack from these groups, and they are asking that we show compassion for them, who would never do the same for us, in fact, they hate us, and their ask is that we hate ourselves, despite there being nothing in it for us to do so, so many of us have still taken up the offer with zeal, if it were just the non-whites that we had to deal with, there would be no issue, we'd easily overpower them and remove them from the country our ancestors had founded. like a divorce where the abused kicks out their abuser from the home they own, it's the white-hating whites who are the problem, and they have the whole damn establishment behind them. which brings us to the second thing restraining white people, hope and faith in the establishment, it was the faith they had in the institutions of their society that kept them from losing hope that somehow there would be a society of peaceful coexistence someday, but now we see our institutions all expose that there is nothing to trust in, our political institutions, legal institutions, financial institutions, economic institutions, media institutions, cultural institutions, educational institutions, stem institutions and any others I failed to mention, are all corrupt to the bone, with no hope of social change coming through any of them. The answer is obvious to a lot of white people right now, then the government and all the other existing institutions of the establishment needs to be overthrown, the police are keeping us from doing what needs to be done, and protecting those who persecute us, so we'd have to build up the courage to go through them as the front line defending the source of our problems, war is coming, revolution is coming, a true insurrection is somewhere down the line. We'd been warned about it and threatened with it for so long, but the reality of acting on such ideas is only been held back by that trust and faith which is quickly eroding. the alt-right were peaceful, with peaceful and voluntary ideas, and showed much concern for everyone involved, they were willing to go through legal and political routes to achieve the changes they desired, which were policies that did not involve force or involuntary actions. the new white right, are a different species entirely, they no longer give a fuck about anyone who isn't white, they want what is best for their people and everyone else can just go to hell for all they care. They ask, why should whites give a shit about people who hate them? they ask what is in it for white people to do x? what benefits white people the most? with no regard for the other races. hate is not something you dive into, hate is something that you fight against, and it pulls you in, you get pushed into hate, and you usually push against it trying to justify reasons not to hate, it is only when those reasons crumble away, and lose their significance, that you eventually give in. The white man is beginning to hate, like truly hate, not just wanting what's best for everyone including white people, but now only wanting what's best for white people, without consideration of the other races.

>Watch Chauvin Trial >One-sided curb-stomping, Obvious verdict is "not guilty" on all charges. >Or it would be, if the whole thing was not being affected by open threats of rioting if the defense doesn't get the verdict they want, which is "guilty" on all charges, with recent memories of the utter hell on Earth that was the riots that occurred last time. >And if the jury wasn't doxxed by corporate media agencies who are known to be thoroughly corrupt and threatening to give out their identities to people who would hurt them and their loved on should they not get the verdict that they s clearly want, which is "guilty" on all charges. >And if members of government weren't calling for the blood of those involved n the case, such as the judge, should they not rule "guilty" on all charges, basically "send an innocent to jail, or lose your entire livelihood, at the very least, and deal with us abusing out power to making your life as miserable as we could, and possibly even arranging a premature end to it". > But the trial is one-sided, on the side of the defense, the reality of how a honest and reasonable and non-coerced jury would rule after such a trial is "not guilty" on all charges. > Prosecution is clearly knowledgeable that no one is holding them to account for any misconduct they engage in, they emotionally manipulate the jury, they present perjurous testimony, submit evidence that was modified due to political pressure, basically pull all manner of bullshit that they shouldn't have been allowed to get away with, I'm thinking to show off just how openly dishonest they could be. >Defense are pussies, they don't challenge any of this stuff, probably because it's well known that the whole court system is rigged against them. >Nevertheless, the whole case of the prosecution is convincing, until the defense gets to poke holes in it, and the whole case against former officer Chauvin just totally fucking collapses. >It's like seeing an intelligent design apologist giving a moving and convincing speech on why Evolution and the Big Bang Cosmology is not scientifically justified, then seeing the Evolution side completely shatter their whole case, and make such a counter-attack, that you realize that the only way the "team design" guys could have won was either by speaking in the absence of opposition, or, as in this case, by rigging the whole contest through means of coercion or corruption, like in this case, through threats and intimidation where violence is on the menu should the result not be ruled in their favor. > So you see a court trial where the verdict is clearly one way, but due to the intimidation and corruption surrounding it, the opposite verdict is ruled. > It's OJ Simpson all over again. >White people are gradually beginning to hate jews, and blacks, and arabs, and hispanics, they were under constant attack from these groups, and they are asking that we show compassion for them, who would never do the same for us, in fact, they hate us, and their ask is that we hate ourselves, despite there being nothing in it for us to do so, so many of us have still taken up the offer with zeal, if it were just the non-whites that we had to deal with, there would be no issue, we'd easily overpower them and remove them from the country our ancestors had founded. like a divorce where the abused kicks out their abuser from the home they own, it's the white-hating whites who are the problem, and they have the whole damn establishment behind them. > which brings us to the second thing restraining white people, hope and faith in the establishment, it was the faith they had in the institutions of their society that kept them from losing hope that somehow there would be a society of peaceful coexistence someday, but now we see our institutions all expose that there is nothing to trust in, our political institutions, legal institutions, financial institutions, economic institutions, media institutions, cultural institutions, educational institutions, stem institutions and any others I failed to mention, are all corrupt to the bone, with no hope of social change coming through any of them. > The answer is obvious to a lot of white people right now, then the government and all the other existing institutions of the establishment needs to be overthrown, the police are keeping us from doing what needs to be done, and protecting those who persecute us, so we'd have to build up the courage to go through them as the front line defending the source of our problems, war is coming, revolution is coming, a true insurrection is somewhere down the line. We'd been warned about it and threatened with it for so long, but the reality of acting on such ideas is only been held back by that trust and faith which is quickly eroding. > the alt-right were peaceful, with peaceful and voluntary ideas, and showed much concern for everyone involved, they were willing to go through legal and political routes to achieve the changes they desired, which were policies that did not involve force or involuntary actions. > the new white right, are a different species entirely, they no longer give a fuck about anyone who isn't white, they want what is best for their people and everyone else can just go to hell for all they care. They ask, why should whites give a shit about people who hate them? they ask what is in it for white people to do x? what benefits white people the most? with no regard for the other races. > hate is not something you dive into, hate is something that you fight against, and it pulls you in, you get pushed into hate, and you usually push against it trying to justify reasons not to hate, it is only when those reasons crumble away, and lose their significance, that you eventually give in. >The white man is beginning to hate, like truly hate, not just wanting what's best for everyone including white people, but now only wanting what's best for white people, without consideration of the other races.

link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Scratch that, I think the relationship of whites to their own race and other races should be like that of the jews, only another white is truly a person, every other race is just like an animal that one could use for their labor or slaughter for their meal, and the sole highest moral good for a white person should be the interests of the white race.

It's time whites reciprocated the treatment we have received from jews and blacks (and arabs, and hispanics, and pretty much every race other than our own) all this time, let us come and do unto them what they have done unto us.

This of course means asians will be pretty much the only ones that get decent treatment, since they have been pretty decent to us.

Realize that the other races are abusive towards whites (with asians as the sole exception), and deserve the same treatment in return. Reciprocation. "Why should white people give a shit about other races who would never do the same for us?" "what is in it for whites to do so?" The solution to escaping abusive relationships is learning to think of relationships in terms of transactionality, learning that unconditional love and forgiveness is unhealthy, and that all relationships should benefit those in them. the relationship of the blacks to the whites who cohabitate in the same countries is best described as that of an abusive spouse and their victim (including the trick of getting the victim to blame themselves for the relationship's problems), here, white nationalism is the equivalent of the victimized spouse wanting a divorce, and hoping amicable terms could be reached for securing it.

Realize also that the other races are parasitic, and need whites (with asians as the sole exception once again), but whites don't need them (in fact, whites will do better without them than with them). Simply leaving these non-whites to fend for themselves is typically enough to destroy them. This is why white nationalism is so devastating, the other races that live among whites cannot maintain the livelihoods they've grown accustomed to on their own, they are so incompetent that they need whites to be their slave caste and work to support them, whites leaving them alone, and being left alone, is as good as a genocide for them. All whites have to do to them is nothing and they start dropping like flies covered in dishsoap, for example, BLM hates whites and especially white police officers, they talk about an epidemic of brutality, and burn down cities in response to alleged incidents of this that catch media attention. So then white police officers let up on their brutality, and immediately blacks start dying in massive numbers, and their areas start getting a lot more poor and deprived as businesses leave. Because blacks are far more prone to being criminals than whites are, and the police brutality that they are so scared of, is actually the very thing keeping those areas somewhat functional and peaceful, without the hated actions of the police, the areas get so bad that black activists who've lived there their entire lives are packing up and leaving. Black people are a lot less intelligent on the aggregate, and so the best way to kill a lot of them fast is usually to give them exactly what they ask for, thing is, once they get what they wanted, they start hating white people for giving it to them, the collective behavior of the black community in any country will be best described as acting like bratty children, if bratty children also happened to commit lots of violent crime (like murder), sex crime (like rape), and property crime (like theft), the fact that they do most of it to other blacks is just wonderful. Whites do blacks in by simple disassociation, and not giving a fuck about them anymore, leave them alone, and they cannot support themselves, they also turn on each other when whites exist the picture, since whites are no longer there to prevent them from killing each other.

Another example, whites in a florida municipality are planning to leave it, the state government is doing everything it can to stop that, even though this population was constantly being attacked by the local black groups and by all the usual institutions to back such hatred of whites. Why are these people all of a sudden so important to the government? because their taxes pay for all the services that blacks use, and most blacks don't pay anything at all, they just collect services, but the white people don't use the services they contribute to funding, essentially they are slaves working to pay for the livelihoods of blacks who hate them. if these white people leave, then the blacks will have their services cut, and their quality of life goes way down, this will also lead to them killing one another. the whites on the other hand will be doing just fine on their own, they will be even better off having shed the burden of the black population, at least for a bit, until those same blacks start trying to get the government to move them into those new areas so they could shit it up and continue living off of the labor of whites.

Why would I care about a black man's suffering? would he care about mine? we both know the answer. Is there something I can get out of giving a fuck what happens to him? no? so why would I want to? I have unfair advantages over blacks? well, why would I want to give any of that up? would they do that, if the situation were reversed? Yeah, I think I'm holding onto it, in fact, it would be in my people's best interests if our advantages were expanded, the larger the gap between us and them, the harder it would be for them to challenge us. This is all a game, it's just a game, and you can do the things that lead to your team winning, or do the things that lead to your team losing, it's gotten crystal clear that there is no option here where everyone wins, and whites have begun to completely lose hope that one should somehow spontaneously appear.

I think the relationship of white people to black people should be the same as the relationship black people have to white people, and the relationship of white people to their own race should be like that of black people to their own race. Scratch that, I think the relationship of whites to their own race and other races should be like that of the jews, only another white is truly a person, every other race is just like an animal that one could use for their labor or slaughter for their meal, and the sole highest moral good for a white person should be the interests of the white race. It's time whites reciprocated the treatment we have received from jews and blacks (and arabs, and hispanics, and pretty much every race other than our own) all this time, let us come and do unto them what they have done unto us. This of course means asians will be pretty much the only ones that get decent treatment, since they have been pretty decent to us. Realize that the other races are abusive towards whites (with asians as the sole exception), and deserve the same treatment in return. Reciprocation. "Why should white people give a shit about other races who would never do the same for us?" "what is in it for whites to do so?" The solution to escaping abusive relationships is learning to think of relationships in terms of transactionality, learning that unconditional love and forgiveness is unhealthy, and that all relationships should benefit those in them. the relationship of the blacks to the whites who cohabitate in the same countries is best described as that of an abusive spouse and their victim (including the trick of getting the victim to blame themselves for the relationship's problems), here, white nationalism is the equivalent of the victimized spouse wanting a divorce, and hoping amicable terms could be reached for securing it. Realize also that the other races are parasitic, and need whites (with asians as the sole exception once again), but whites don't need them (in fact, whites will do better without them than with them). Simply leaving these non-whites to fend for themselves is typically enough to destroy them. This is why white nationalism is so devastating, the other races that live among whites cannot maintain the livelihoods they've grown accustomed to on their own, they are so incompetent that they need whites to be their slave caste and work to support them, whites leaving them alone, and being left alone, is as good as a genocide for them. All whites have to do to them is nothing and they start dropping like flies covered in dishsoap, for example, BLM hates whites and especially white police officers, they talk about an epidemic of brutality, and burn down cities in response to alleged incidents of this that catch media attention. So then white police officers let up on their brutality, and immediately blacks start dying in massive numbers, and their areas start getting a lot more poor and deprived as businesses leave. Because blacks are far more prone to being criminals than whites are, and the police brutality that they are so scared of, is actually the very thing keeping those areas somewhat functional and peaceful, without the hated actions of the police, the areas get so bad that black activists who've lived there their entire lives are packing up and leaving. Black people are a lot less intelligent on the aggregate, and so the best way to kill a lot of them fast is usually to give them exactly what they ask for, thing is, once they get what they wanted, they start hating white people for giving it to them, the collective behavior of the black community in any country will be best described as acting like bratty children, if bratty children also happened to commit lots of violent crime (like murder), sex crime (like rape), and property crime (like theft), the fact that they do most of it to other blacks is just wonderful. Whites do blacks in by simple disassociation, and not giving a fuck about them anymore, leave them alone, and they cannot support themselves, they also turn on each other when whites exist the picture, since whites are no longer there to prevent them from killing each other. Another example, whites in a florida municipality are planning to leave it, the state government is doing everything it can to stop that, even though this population was constantly being attacked by the local black groups and by all the usual institutions to back such hatred of whites. Why are these people all of a sudden so important to the government? because their taxes pay for all the services that blacks use, and most blacks don't pay anything at all, they just collect services, but the white people don't use the services they contribute to funding, essentially they are slaves working to pay for the livelihoods of blacks who hate them. if these white people leave, then the blacks will have their services cut, and their quality of life goes way down, this will also lead to them killing one another. the whites on the other hand will be doing just fine on their own, they will be even better off having shed the burden of the black population, at least for a bit, until those same blacks start trying to get the government to move them into those new areas so they could shit it up and continue living off of the labor of whites. Why would I care about a black man's suffering? would he care about mine? we both know the answer. Is there something I can get out of giving a fuck what happens to him? no? so why would I want to? I have unfair advantages over blacks? well, why would I want to give any of that up? would they do that, if the situation were reversed? Yeah, I think I'm holding onto it, in fact, it would be in my people's best interests if our advantages were expanded, the larger the gap between us and them, the harder it would be for them to challenge us. This is all a game, it's just a game, and you can do the things that lead to your team winning, or do the things that lead to your team losing, it's gotten crystal clear that there is no option here where everyone wins, and whites have begun to completely lose hope that one should somehow spontaneously appear.

link

(post is archived)