WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

238

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

Looks like pretty solid SJW work. 'Probably" causes cancer isn't definitive, except to libtards. Carcinogens do not cause canver. They act as a sort of catalyst in people that may have a weaker immune system when it comes to fighting off the small number of cancer cells that normally develop and are removed, before they develop into deadly tumors. If carcinogens caused cancer, everyone would get cancer.

[–] 3 pts

Not eating meat doesn't seem any

[–] 3 pts

Living causes cancer

Not everyone dies of cancer.

[–] 0 pt

Not saying that everybody does die of cancer.

[–] 1 pt

LOL. I have to talk with you

[–] 0 pt

"Processed meat was classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), based on sufficient evidence in humans that the consumption of processed meat causes colorectal cancer."

"After thoroughly reviewing the accumulated scientific literature, a Working Group of 22 experts from 10 countries convened by the IARC Monographs Programme classified the consumption of red meat as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A), based on limited evidence that the consumption of red meat causes cancer in humans and strong mechanistic evidence supporting a carcinogenic effect. This association was observed mainly for colorectal cancer, but associations were also seen for pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer."