WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K

This is just one of many possible steps towards making women more conservative.

The others include slut shaming, banning birth control, removing no-fault divorce, and limiting what jobs women are allowed to do in general, while also only allowing truly exceptional women into college (for STEM stuff, not any of that faggot arts shit).

This is just one of many possible steps towards making women more conservative. The others include slut shaming, banning birth control, removing no-fault divorce, and limiting what jobs women are allowed to do in general, while also only allowing truly exceptional women into college (for STEM stuff, not any of that faggot arts shit).

(post is archived)

[–] 13 pts

Just stop giving them free shit stolen from men by the government. Make them accountable for their actions, stop hiring them just to hire them.

[–] 6 pts

This is the real answer. Stop letting them play the game of life on easy mode and they will change their ways pretty damned quick once they aren't immune from their actions/decisions.

[–] 4 pts

Maybe if the foreign thots have big tits, but that's pretty uncommon among Asians and spics. Aryan milker supremacy is undeniable.

[–] 3 pts

I've dated big tittied Latinas. I called their big tits Whore-Chatta Tatas.

[–] 3 pts

I don't know how you did it. The spic accent is so annoying and bothersome.

[–] 2 pts

Plus they're fucking shitskins.

[–] [deleted] -1 pt

Have you heard the Australian accent?

[–] -1 pt

The ones I dated didn't have much of an accent. I have a fetish for Latinas.

[–] 1 pt

Still a rare trait among the spic population. They're not all Salma Hayek/Sophia Vergara.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts (edited )

You just need to reward them more for good behaviour than the dysgenic hordes or the state rewards them for bad behaviour.

I don't mean monetary reward btw. In a natural setting, where women are rooted within a local community, tribe & culture, they are much less mercenary. In practice, do most men shower positive attention on women for behaving good, or do they reward their bad behaviour? Not only that, but the quality of the men who are giving them attention is a massive factor too, are they men or are they boys? Will they keep them safe or will they abandon them & their children? Are they the kinds of men that can overcome any odds or are they cowards?

[–] 1 pt

Part of that culture involves burg maidens, old ladies, and other married women all watching them and keeping them in line when they start to stray down the path of whoredom.

[–] 2 pts

This is playing out in Sweden of all places. Swedes are natural blonde hair blue eyed chads and stacies which is why (((they))) flood Sweden with muzzies.

Related or unrelated to the influx of muzzies which none of them seem to mind, Swedish men have been importing Thai wives. There is a growing Thai community in Sweden as a result. Swedish women are trying To keep out Thai women as a result.

[–] 2 pts

Swedish men have been importing Thai wives

That's probably more related to the ((feminist)) gov turning Swedish wives into the same dogshit in America.

I love watching women in competition.

Especially on the beach playing volleyball.

[–] 2 pts

"Latinas" i.e., filthy taco niggers age like fucking eggs left in the sun. Hot at 19, butterball smeared in shit at 20.

And shovel face zipper heads are mostly fucking ugly as hell in general.

[–] 1 pt

truly exceptional women

If you allow any kind of "exception" whatsoever in the first place, it eventually results in our current situation, without any exception.

There are countless numbers of vital reasons to not allow any kind of exception about "career women". To list just a few of them: 1. The "truly exceptional women" itself is a myth, if you are talking about a truly historical figures, not just "wow, that's really smart" ones. For example: Emmy Noether is a massive hoax, all of "her" work is either a direct consequence of other people's work or just trivial. The only "exceptional" achievement of Marie Qurie is that she is married to Pierre Qurie, a truly exceptional chemist. The list goes forever. 2. The most intelligent women should be married at young age and have more babies, instead of going college and wasting their most fertile ages. Really, do you want a dysgenic future? 3. The existence of a female in a predominantly male group is by itself severely destructive to the group. No amount of so-called "truly exceptional women" can even remotely compensate this negative effect. 4. To allow women in what is traditionally considered as men's institutions, first you must destroy, or at least crack, the cultural "gender norms". Culture is not a static thing, it constantly changes(albeit slowly). And allowing exception for women to infiltrate men's group gives some kind of negative "inertia" to the direction of that cultural change. You know, the slippery slope is real in politics. 5. (this is related to number 3) Allowing women in predominantly men's group necessarily makes so many problems, primarily sexual ones. And not only you waste tremendous amounts of otherwise unnecessary costs to resolve these dumb female-related dramas, along the way you gradually destroy the masculine culture of the group to make the group more "comfortable" to these females. This cannot be avoided unless you just outright ban women in the first place. Maybe you can declare some preventive rules like "if there is any sexual issue, it is always women's fault" or "women should not do this and that", but that rules never can be upheld in the long run, because ironically, men of the said group would eventually overturn it for various of stupid, dumb reasons made by females who plays typical victim cards. Again, this cannot be avoided in any way, unless you just outright ban women completely without any kind of exception in any circumstances.

p.s. Sorry for my shit English, I'm not a native speaker.

[–] 1 pt

all you have to do is ignore women and they go ballistic

Load more (9 replies)