Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

536

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

Those are around the world numbers not just the us, you think Twitter only hits the US market?

[–] • 2 pts

I didn't forget international, but I didn't think there would be much international interest in Trump

[–] • 4 pts

Seriously? They view him as a brake on US jew zionist hegemony. Do some reading.

[–] • 1 pt

Good. I didn't grasp the magnitude of his reach I guess.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

>They view him as a brake on US jew zionist hegemony.

Not really, trump has his mega ziotard moments let's not forget that. Muslims for instance are well aware of this I mean Trump's former backer, adelson, was a mega ziotard himself to begin with AND he offed soleimani... I'm not saying it's a good or a bad thing I'm just saying he did. And he moved the US embassy to jerusalem et recognized jerusalem as capital of israel... That's very ziotard of him.

What's true however is that he's perceived as a brake against globalism and US foreign and domestic policies insanity in general. In a pool of candidates ranging from mostly irrelevant to pieces-of-shit-sellouts-cock-suckers to outright batshit insane lunatics, he's the better option

Of course, never trumpers will remain never trumpers

[–] • 2 pts

Outside of the US, Trump is loved by all except libtards.

[–] • 1 pt

Good. I didn't grasp the magnitude of his reach I guess.

[–] • 1 pt

Huh. Really?

[–] • 0 pt

I mean, I give international like 50M max of the 230M. Would be interesting to know for sure though!

[–] • 1 pt

The news write more about trump than any local politician everywhere im 99% sure that is why it was such a slog after biden took over. Ive problably heard more about trump from my local news outlet than from american and international.

[–] • 2 pts

Number of views =/= actual unique individual people.

You can't ever trust view counts for anything. They are as real and meaningful as Rettardit post scores. It's all made up for money.

[–] • 0 pt

Number of views =/= actual unique individual people.

Is there any site/service that has the problem figured out, or reduced the error further than others? I remember back in the simple hit counter website days, each reload counted. But surely they use something more sophisticated now

[–] • 3 pts

Is there any site/service that has the problem figured out, or reduced the error further than others? I remember back in the simple hit counter website days, each reload counted.

Nope. These days it's much to easy to fake views/hits from multiple automated systems using VPNs and IP address switching. Also botnets and zombie computers under central control of (((hackers))) can influence the numbers any way they want. Oh, and don't forget the view/click farms in china that can be hired to drive up traffic and views. When there's money involved you can be sure the jews and the chinks will be all over it.

But surely they use something more sophisticated now

The jews have no incentive to fix the system because only the smart people like us will cry foul. The rest of the NPC consoomers love the idea of "breaking the internet" because it sounds so freakin' cool to them. NPCs are impressed by big numbers attached to things they may or may not care about for real.

[–] • 1 pt

It's all so tiresome. Let's go back

[–] • 1 pt

If this is a real number its probably including bits and pieces on like twitter,tiktok, insta, etc. This morning it was at a believable 100 million.

[–] • 1 pt

I don't think anyone can count internet streaming data properly and they love to make their numbers stupid high to grab advertisers.

[–] • 1 pt

Xitters algorithm for 'impressions', which I think equals views, is compounded with sharing/reposting.