Why, just why do they have to insert climate change nonsense where it doesn’t belong. It’s as bad as being reminded to think of the hallocost.
Also, not surprising to anyone who’s ever cut trees or weeds down, and gosh darn it, they come back up!
Why, just why do they have to insert climate change nonsense where it doesn’t belong. It’s as bad as being reminded to think of the hallocost.
Also, not surprising to anyone who’s ever cut trees or weeds down, and gosh darn it, they come back up!
Fascinating. It’s cool reading stuff like this, but I struggle with it when littered throughout are retarded statements like this one
The findings suggest redwoods have the tools to cope with catastrophic fires driven by climate change, Rocha says
Really? This fool expects me to believe that trees evolved over millennia to have characteristics that allow them to weather this wholly unique, never before seen, and entirely man made phenomena? No chance that trees evolved to have this characteristic through millennia of battling changing conditions on a world so heavily influenced - within a band of conditions - by things like the sun…. Nope, it’s been prepared to face man made climate change.
Gtfo.
FTA: The findings suggest redwoods have the tools to cope with catastrophic fires driven by climate change....or started by criminal arsonists.
(post is archived)