As far as I'm concerned, it was her own fault for even taking part against a mentally-ill male. All females who take part in the charade against a mentally-ill male are complicit in it still being a thing.
If the female athletes would "grow a pair", not put up with it and refuse to take part, it would be just one mentally-ill male standing on the court all alone with no one to play with. And that would be that.
But almost all women are greedy, cannot think for themselves and must appeal to authority regardless of whether what is being instructed by this apparent "authority" for the female to do is logical, or even safe. It's in their genes, which define their entire brain structure and thus their outlook on life and ability to make decisions for themselves.
It's her own fault she competed vs a deranged male and now left paralyzed with brain damage.
I agree. It's not like I want to see any woman suffer so badly, but there needs to be a hard "I'm not participating in this." and if the only way to learn is through serious injury, then so be it. I do wish her a steadfast recovery.
Well, I guess to some degree if she was aware ahead of time then I agree. Sometimes the actual Women are never told and then are competing against a Man without knowing about it before hand. In a situation where you take the court or the pool or whatever and you realize that a nigger faggot tranny is competing with you/against you, just stop and walk away. Fuck everyone else. Don't allow them the space.
Get kicked off the team or whatever. Then sue the school/state/whatever for putting you in bodily harm that is unacceptable.
It's telling that you feel the women must "grow a pair" to solve the problem of them being victimized by other males yet place no responsibility on other men to end this.
That thing never should have made it to the bus after laughing at injuring a woman.
She accepted to participate. As long as women like her will do, the circus will go on.
Victimized
It's telling that you call her a "victim". She was on the receiving end of the violence, but she was not a victim. She intentionally put herself in that position when it is obvious to anyone who has a functional brain what would happen. She took part out of greed - a chance at a scholarship for college volleyball which she put ahead of her own well-being. She is not a victim.
Despite it being extremely obvious to anyone with a functional brain what would happen, if a woman is told by her boss (her authority figure) that she needs to walk out onto the interstate into traffic or she's fired, and she does and gets nailed by a semi, she is not a victim. She chose not to walk away and be fired and traded her own safety in order to maintain the ability to continue funding her lifestyle and remain employed. She's an idiot that played stupid games and won a stupid prize.
Or, if a woman wanting to be an actress is told by her agent (her authority figure) to go to a kike's hotel room to "audition" for a part, it is obvious to anyone with a functional brain that no "audition" would happen in that hotel room and the kike is going to demand sex in exchange for the part.
She can choose to walk away with principles intact and throw away a chance at money and fame and risk losing her agent and never getting another role again and lose her dream of being an actress, or she can sell herself and fuck the kike. Whether she gets the part or not, it does not make her a "victim" - it makes her a whore. She chose to sell her body out of greed - she exchanged her principles for money and a chance at fame.
She could have and should have chosen not to take part in it. Play tranny games, win tranny prizes.
Yes, women who are injured by violence are 'victims', that's how English works.
The rest of your wall of text is just you trying to pretend that men play no role here. Society is the way it is because of weak men. The kind of weak men who would blame women rather than be honest.
Not sure how a man could do this. The legal ramifications would be massive.
(post is archived)