WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

No, we are facing collapse because people keep attacking the foundations of civilization as if it were automatically a good thing to do because of muh "creative destruction." People who think in platitudes can't build civilization because they can't build anything. Nobody built a bridge with trendy sayings and intentionally trying to do a bad job. Nobody maintained a damn the same way. Nobody maintained a civilization that way either.

It's these people and the socialists who are at fault. They are both people more interesting in looking cool and sounding smart in one given moment, than actually thinking about problems and applying care to important issues.

They claim man is not that civilized. They should speak for themselves. By that they are a self fulfilling prophesy and I think that's what they mean to be, because they somehow fool themselves by their own words to think it makes sense. Basically what he is arguing by saying "man is not that civilized, we need to prepare for harder times because of apparent collapse. Therefore what we are doing is smart." Is the same as saying man is not that disease resistant. Look we can already see the signs. Therefore we should spread as many germs around as possible, because buckle up buckaroo, you might as well get used to pestilence. I guess especially so because we are about to cause it.

If this man's words resonated with you at all then you are an idiot. This is why we need eugenics. Those of you dumb enough to think that causing a problem is automatically the solution to it's existence can go ahead and get eugenified. And those of us capable of managing a civilization can do so without your retardation.

we are facing collapse because people keep attacking the foundations of civilization

I think it really is that simple. The Frankfurt school concepts of deconstructionism and problematization have crept in because people have a broken (or lack of) sense of virtue and merit.

For example, if that extinction rebellion faggot wanted to do something about the problems in society he could become somebody worth emulating instead of looking for ways to agitate and pick away at everyone else's flow. While he claims his movement is racist it shows he doesn't understand the fundamental difference between fascism and communism. Kind of like how people who don't understand Logos or true virtue will try to emulate it with accounting and accumulation of deeds.