Imagine all the other covert programs going on that we have no clue about.

@AOU how do I sticky a post now?

So out of curiosity I searched "the Lancet and china ties" https://search.brave.com/search?q=the+Lancet+and+china+ties&source=desktop They don't seem owned, that's what I got 🌐 Concerns about medical abuses against Uighurs in China thelancet.com › journals › lancet › article › PIIS0140-6736(21)00033-7 › fulltext We cannot provide a description for this page right now 🌐 China's successful control of COVID-19 - The Lancet thelancet.com › journals › laninf › article › PIIS1473-3099(20)30800-8 › fulltext November 8, 2020 - We cannot provide a description for this page right now 🌐 US–China health exchange and collaboration following ... thelancet.com › journals › lancet › article › PIIS0140-6736(21)00734-0 › fulltext We cannot provide a description for this page right now 🌐 China's response to COVID-19: a chance for collaboration thelancet.com › journals › lancet › article › PIIS0140-6736(21)00823-0 › fulltext We cannot provide a description for this page right now 🌐 Statement in support of the scientists, public health ... thelancet.com › lancet › article › s0140-6736(20)30418-9 February 20, 2020 - We cannot provide a description for this page right now 🌐 Coronavirus in China - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine thelancet.com › journals › lanres › article › PIIS2213-2600(20)30056-4 › fulltext February 3, 2020 - On Dec 31, 2019, China alerted WHO to several cases of pneumonia associated with an unknown virus. The cases were concentrated in Wuhan City, in Hubei Province in central China, home to 11 million people. By Jan 7, 2020, there was confirmation that a new type of coronavirus had emerged. 🌐 Planetary Health (Chinese translation) - Infographics - The ... thelancet.com › infographics › planetary-health-chinese We cannot provide a description for this page right now 🌐 COVID-19 and China: lessons and the way forward - The Lancet thelancet.com › journals › lancet › article › PIIS0140-6736(20)31637-8 › fulltext July 25, 2020 - We cannot provide a description for this page right now 🌐 Protecting Chinese doctors - The Lancet thelancet.com › journals › lancet › article › PIIS0140-6736(20)30003-9 › fulltext January 11, 2020 - We cannot provide a description for this page right now 🌐 The Lancet | The best science for better lives thelancet.com 1 month ago - We cannot provide a description for this page right now However this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lancet#February_2020_letter_dismissing_lab-leak_theory February 2020 letter dismissing lab-leak theory Main article: Lancet letter (COVID-19) On 19 February 2020, The Lancet published a letter signed by 27 scientists that stated: "We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin... and overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife," adding: "Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumours, and prejudice that jeopardise our global collaboration in the fight against this virus." The letter has been criticized for having a chilling effect on scientific research and the scientific community by implying that scientists who "bring up the lab-leak theory... are doing the work of conspiracy theorists";[26][27][28] the statement was deemed to have "effectively ended the debate over COVID-19's origins before it began".[27] Further criticism of the letter was focused on the fact that, according to emails obtained through FOIA, members involved in producing the letter concealed their involvement "to creat[e] the impression of scientific unanimity" and failed to disclose conflicts of interest.[27] After having published letters supporting only the natural origins theory, The Lancet published a letter in September 2021 from a group of 16 virologists, biologists and biosecurity specialists saying that "Research-related hypotheses are not misinformation or conjecture" and that "Scientific journals should open their columns to in-depth analyses of all hypotheses."[29] The Times of India described The Lancet's decision to publish the letter as a "u-turn".[30]