Thanks for the link.
Thanks for the link.
This is the 23rd November 2020 archive.org capture. Read section "6 Epidemiology". Barely a 3 sentence desription: https://web.archive.org/web/20201123174056/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myocarditis
This is the 3rd December 2020 capture. The "6 Epidemiology" section is now more elaborate, with emphasis on active groups and young people and even children and pregnant women. And a large emphasis on young men: https://web.archive.org/web/20201203083211/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myocarditis
The first mass vaccination, non-trial mRNA jab was administered on the 9th of December 2020: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/08/coventry-woman-90-first-patient-to-receive-covid-vaccine-in-nhs-campaign https://web.archive.org/web/20201208073028/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/08/coventry-woman-90-first-patient-to-receive-covid-vaccine-in-nhs-campaign
THEY KNEW.
This is the **23rd November 2020** archive.org capture. Read section "6 Epidemiology". Barely a 3 sentence desription:
https://web.archive.org/web/20201123174056/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myocarditis
This is the **3rd December 2020** capture. The "6 Epidemiology" section is now more elaborate, with emphasis on active groups and young people and even children and pregnant women. And a large emphasis on young men:
https://web.archive.org/web/20201203083211/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myocarditis
The first mass vaccination, non-trial mRNA jab was administered on the **9th of December 2020**:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/08/coventry-woman-90-first-patient-to-receive-covid-vaccine-in-nhs-campaign
https://web.archive.org/web/20201208073028/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/08/coventry-woman-90-first-patient-to-receive-covid-vaccine-in-nhs-campaign
**THEY KNEW.**
Here's the edit where all of that was put in on November 30, 2020, supposedly by a student:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Myocarditis&type=revision&diff=991615852&oldid=991311466
At least for now Wikipedia keeps a public history of all the edits.
Here are all of the user's contributions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cailen1
The Myocarditis edit was their last edit. That huge edit history you see was to talk pages. If someone wanted to make an account look legit this would be a good way to do it. The account was active for only two months.
Here's the edit where all of that was put in on November 30, 2020, supposedly by a student:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Myocarditis&type=revision&diff=991615852&oldid=991311466
At least for now Wikipedia keeps a public history of all the edits.
Here are all of the user's contributions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cailen1
The Myocarditis edit was their last edit. That huge edit history you see was to talk pages. If someone wanted to make an account look legit this would be a good way to do it. The account was active for only two months.
They act like we are stupid and will forget.
They act like we are stupid and will forget.
The OP is a bit misleading, yes the entry has been recently updated with a wider discussion, but the journals being referenced are all from existing (old) publications, like from 2016... This isn't "shit we made up yesterday just to deflect"
It could well be cherry picked, but that's for the OP to make that case.
This looks more like getting the intern to update a page because people are searching for "myocarditis" a lot... but hey, this is the tinfoil level of Poal, so don't mind me.
The OP is a bit misleading,
yes the entry has been recently updated with a wider discussion, but the journals being referenced are all from existing (old) publications, like from 2016...
This isn't "shit we made up yesterday just to deflect"
It could well be cherry picked, but that's for the OP to make that case.
This looks more like getting the intern to update a page because people are searching for "myocarditis" a lot...
but hey, this is the tinfoil level of Poal, so don't mind me.
This looks more like getting the intern to update a page because people are searching for "myocarditis" a lot... but hey, this is the tinfoil level of Poal, so don't mind me.
Why would people be searching for myocarditis “a lot” before the vaccines came out? The “intern” had psychic powers and knew people would start searching for it after the vax rollout so he updated it preventively on 3rd December 2020?
>This looks more like getting the intern to update a page because people are searching for "myocarditis" a lot...
but hey, this is the tinfoil level of Poal, so don't mind me.
Why would people be searching for myocarditis “a lot” before the vaccines came out? The “intern” had psychic powers and knew people would start searching for it after the vax rollout so he updated it preventively on 3rd December 2020?
Why would people be searching for myocarditis “a lot” before the vaccines came out?
Published online 2020 May 5 Recognizing COVID-19–related myocarditis: The possible pathophysiology and proposed guideline for diagnosis and management https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199677/
because myocarditis and covid were linked...
//
in fact you can go back to 2016 and see the same thing:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26922692/ Acute myocarditis associated with novel Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MeRS-CoV)
>Why would people be searching for myocarditis “a lot” before the vaccines came out?
Published online 2020 May 5
Recognizing COVID-19–related myocarditis: The possible pathophysiology and proposed guideline for diagnosis and management
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199677/
because myocarditis and covid were linked...
//
in fact you can go back to 2016 and see the same thing:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26922692/
Acute myocarditis associated with novel Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MeRS-CoV)
How long do you think it takes to develop a bioweapon? It's not an overnight thing. 3 years before its' release is not remotely out of the question. Young athletes didn't always just randomly drop dead on the field. This is new, and no amount of gaslighting is going to change that.
How long do you think it takes to develop a bioweapon? It's not an overnight thing. 3 years before its' release is not remotely out of the question. Young athletes didn't always just randomly drop dead on the field. This is new, and no amount of gaslighting is going to change that.
Shut up kike
Shut up kike
At least the update admits immunization can cause it.
At least the update admits immunization can cause it.
(post is archived)