“The most notorious example of that is the Andrew Wakefield paper that was retracted from Lansing that suggested there was a connection between vaccines and autism. There is not, but that lives on,” said Caulfield.
Just because the paper was retracted doesn't mean it was wrong. It was probably retracted due to political and social pressure from the left.
>“The most notorious example of that is the Andrew Wakefield paper that was retracted from Lansing that suggested there was a connection between vaccines and autism. There is not, but that lives on,” said Caulfield.
Just because the paper was retracted doesn't mean it was wrong. It was probably retracted due to political and social pressure from the left.
That paper was retracted not because they disputed the results. Also, the combination vaccine does cause issues. It's given to children at too young an age.
That paper was retracted not because they disputed the results. Also, the combination vaccine does cause issues. It's given to children at too young an age.
(post is archived)