WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

481

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I'll add a bit to this conversation - some deductions I've reached.

I was following the situation closely on Voat at the beginning of the outbreak in China.

If you look at the sulfur emissions this morning, you will notice Sudbury Ontario takes the lead as the planets largest emitter of sulfur. That's the nickle mines - biggest polluter in the world. You will also see Wuhan is another major polluter, one of the largest in the world, but pollutes at levels between half to two thirds of Sudbury - and that sulfur comes from coal fired power generators.

I mention this now because during the outbreak, sulfur emissions from Wuhan reached levels ten to twenty five times higher than normal levels - from burning human bodies. This went on for 8 weeks or more. February, March, April 2020.

I suspect millions died in Wuhan, and the Chinese military covered it up.

There were no private twitter communications coming out of Wuhan after February 6th - total communications blackout.

Whatever they got hit with, it was not the same virus that was supposed to have spread to the West. We saw the random collapses, the funky chicken shakes, whole families wiped out at home, etc. We didn't see that here, or really anywhere else on the planet. We did not see mass casualties.

China also did not see mass casualties outside of Wuhan and Chongqing. It was only really bad in these two locations, despite infected people from Wuhan having spread the virus across half the country during the Chinese new year annual exodus.

Another possibility is that it was the same virus, however the people of Wuhan and Chongqing had already been pre exposed to another agent of some kind, rendering them more susceptible somehow.

During the initial Chinese medical trials performed in January 2020 of infected patients, before the virus was officially named, the death rate of confirmed infected patients was 47% with an average age of about 55. It mostly killed old people, but it also killed other age groups.

If they were pushing flu shots on this population prior to the outbreak, the contents of those flu shots could have been anything.

Again, notice how the rest of China did not have the same experience. If the actual virus had the lethality it supposedly had in Wuhan, we would have seen much more death in China, and probably elsewhere.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

... ten to twenty five times higher than normal levels - from burning human bodies.

Burning human bodies is not that easy to scale into an industrial level.

We saw the random collapses, the funky chicken shakes

And we were told that these were pictures from China. But whenever we see bad news from China (the economy crashes, the dams will collapse in the next rain, the CCP is failing its people, the revolution will start tomorrow) it's propaganda made in Taiwan or HK.

the death rate of confirmed infected patients was 47%

The case fatality rate was high because people tried to sit it out without treatment.

... the lethality it supposedly had in Wuhan

A few months later they made a study where almost every citizen was tested (10 million - so they still were all there), they found 300 positives (two different PCR tests), and 200 of them with the antibody levels of an actual infection (-> PCR resulted in 1/3 false positives even when double-checked). All of the 200 positives were asymptomatic, and nobody around them got infected. The study showed that the virus is not that dangerous at all, and that asymptomatics don't spread.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w