WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

710

Didn't read the details but the headline says it all

Updated with link, thanks stupid bird: https://www.scivisionpub.com/abstract-display.php?id=1811

Didn't read the details but the headline says it all Updated with link, thanks stupid bird: https://www.scivisionpub.com/abstract-display.php?id=1811

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts (edited )

Details are.

The scientist used the manufacturer's own studies and added up all problems caused by the vaccines in their studies data.

When you use the metric "all problems and morbidities" its clear that the vaccines cause more severe problems than they help.

The vaccine makers instead used the metric "prevents severe covid infection" which is the wrong metric to use because that excludes all the non covid problems the vaccines cause.

Additionally even using the "prevents severe covid infections" metric the vaccines prevent a very small number of severe covid infections...like 6 out of 20,000.

The manufacturer's want you to only count the good which is slight. That would be like continuing to use thalidomide because the manufacturer's want you to only notice it reduces nausea in pregnant women and exclude the fact that it causes arm less and legless babies.

[–] 4 pts

Prevents severe covid by killing all people who would have gotten severe covid and then some for good measure.

[–] 1 pt

I really need the 6 out of 20,000 thing clarified. Is that because only a very small percent of people exposed develop severe infections to begin with?