Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

284

About 2 weeks ago, I had picked out with tweezers a little black worm from one of the blue masks. I was able to verify that it swam when submerged in .

Anyways, I was doing some cleaning up, and I examined the plate I had set the worm down on, and noticed it was still there. This shows that it's made of some pretty dense materials, and it is not an ordinary piece of dust.

I was feeling a little bad about just washing it down the drain, since it could end up harming a fish or whatever. I took a powerful storm lighter and tried to incinerate it but nothing happened. I tried pointing the lighter at the hair that was on the plate, and it disappeared instantaneously.

At last, I pointed it at the black worm for several seconds. I was worried that I was going to damage the plate it was on. Eventually, after 5 seconds, it seemed that it began to burn alter it's appearance.

This shows that the mask worm is not some common kind of textile. Polyester or nylon would have easily melted.

The mystery deepens. Is it really some kind of nanotech designed to poison or control us?

We should get some youtubers to examine the physical properties of these worms They seem to be easy to find.

About 2 weeks ago, I had picked out with tweezers a little black worm from one of the blue masks. I was able to verify that it swam when submerged in [ethanol](https://www.bitchute.com/video/cDKF4jkCCpzc/). Anyways, I was doing some cleaning up, and I examined the plate I had set the worm down on, and noticed it was still there. This shows that it's made of some pretty dense materials, and it is not an ordinary piece of dust. I was feeling a little bad about just washing it down the drain, since it could end up harming a fish or whatever. I took a powerful storm lighter and tried to incinerate it but nothing happened. I tried pointing the lighter at the hair that was on the plate, and it disappeared instantaneously. At last, I pointed it at the black worm for several seconds. I was worried that I was going to damage the plate it was on. Eventually, after 5 seconds, it seemed that it began to burn alter it's appearance. This shows that the mask worm is not some common kind of textile. Polyester or nylon would have easily melted. The mystery deepens. Is it really some kind of nanotech designed to poison or control us? We should get some youtubers to examine the physical properties of these worms They seem to be easy to find.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] • 1 pt

We should get some youtubers to examine the physical properties of these worms

How about you get someone who isn't a complete moron in the realm of science to examine these "worms" instead? You know, someone who has the ability to use magnification (microscope) and proper scientific methods and rigor instead of wild as claims with shitty amateur video that shows nothing concrete at all. Hell I'd even settle for a first year chemistry, biology or biochem student with a cheap $30 USB microscope over some dumbass YouTuber with no critical thinking skills.

You would think if there were something real here, one of these professional or at least well equipped and educated home scientists would have found it by now. It's odd how only backwoods yokels and the kind of people who make Q videos are the ones finding these "worms" and no one else. I'm not saying there isn't a possibility this is something real, but come on, let's get some better investigation going that doesn't involve YouTubers and Qtards. That sort of thing just makes you look bad and invalidates your findings by being so poorly investigated.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

Something more like this possibly? They also state that more lab tests are being performed.

Microscopy photos of covid swabs, covid masks and mysterious red and blue fibers – NaturalNews.com

[–] • 0 pt

Yes, these images are much, much better and clearly show the fibers (yes fibers not worms) are embedded in the materials. The only problem with this source is the speculation as to the nature of the fibers- they assume the colored (red, blue, black) fibers are deliberately put there. In textile manufacture you will invariably end up with stray fibers making it into your final products since the factory is saturated with fibers in the air and on all equipment, tools and people who work there. Products will also pick up stray and random fibers in the environment which is why forensic fiber analysis is done for murders and the like.

Nothing is pure in this world and textile fibers end up in every single thing at some point. Who knows just how many of such stray fibers we have all eaten, drank or breathed in our lifetimes. One only need to look at the dust in your home under a bit of magnification to realize that monofilament dust is everywhere and makes up most of the airborne particulates in our homes. These masks will collect them as well both during manufacture and use. It's just how it goes in the real world.

We need more investigation like this but with less jumping to conclusions and more scientific honesty. Otherwise I think they did a good job on the photos. It certainly has gone a long way to give me a sense of confidence that these fibers are not worms or nefarious nanotech but simply mundane monofilament dust contamination.

[–] • 1 pt

I saw an interview with a doctor who started an amateur investigation into these black worms. She invested in a high powered microscope and sent the video to a microbiologist who she stated believes them to be a kind a flat worm. I don't have a link to hand but I'm sure if you do a quick dig it will present itself.

I haven't used one those masks and won't be using one in the future so I have no skin in this game but I found the video interesting nonetheless. She does seem a little over emotional about her findings but its kind of understandable if this is a real phenomenon

[–] • 0 pt

She invested in a high powered microscope and sent the video to a microbiologist who she stated believes them to be a kind a flat worm.

That microbiologist should have tried to reproduce the findings rather than make assumptions on the video provided. If he believes them to be some sort of flatworm, then it is imperative he do his own investigation to back up or discredit the doctor's video. Science involves rigor and practical testing/experimentation. Video analysis should be left to those in forensics if the video was obtained in a proper scientific method or process. Without evidence that the video was produced in a controlled and scientific manner, one cannot take the video on faith that there was not error or contamination or deception brought in by the video maker. This is why independent reproducibility is important in science.

[–] • 1 pt

I imagine the microbiologist is investigating it in a more rigorous manner if they feel it is warranted. The doctor who did the initial work made every attempt to ensure clinical rigor in a home setting. I believe she said she would be doing more follow up work but it hasn't passed my radar currently. Its moderately interesting but not a huge deal to me personally