One wee big problem with the article - the reverse primer is 5' -> 3'. The reference assembly they are citing is archived in sense/5' annotation. They'd need to find the inverse primer sequence in the reference assembly for this story to hold true. As it is, it looks like a coincidence; no echoes.
One wee [big](#spoiler) problem with the article - the reverse primer is 5' -> 3'. The reference assembly they are citing is archived in sense/5' annotation. They'd need to find the inverse primer sequence in the reference assembly for this story to hold true. As it is, it looks like a coincidence; no echoes.
(post is archived)