What's your proof that it's not new?
I spent all of the past year on Voat posting all kinds of evidence of lies and fakery involving the Covid hoax, some of which I’ve observed at a hospital myself, but it was never convincingly isolated, described, demonstrated, and never fulfilled Koch’s postulates of infectious disease.
Also, the testing kits were never corroborated by large scale electron microscope studies.
The CDC admitted in July that they don’t have a pure virus sample. I have seen multiple FOIA requests sent to multiple universities and labs around the world that have all been answered with the statement that no records exist at that facility of the CV19 virus being isolated anywhere.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus#Infection_in_humans
>Coronaviruses vary significantly in risk factor. Some can kill more than 30% of those infected, such as MERS-CoV, and some are relatively harmless, such as the common cold.[50]
What about MERS? Is there any proof of its existence or does it also fail to show up when you actually look for proof of its existence?
Where I'm getting at, is that, why use a non existing virus while one could very well "update" an existing one? I mean it's more convincing when people actually get sick
Also there's this
>“With my colleague, bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez, we carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus,” explains Luc Montagnier, interviewed by Dr Jean-François Lemoine for the daily podcast at Pourquoi Docteur, adding that others have already explored this avenue:
>Indian researchers have already tried to publish the results of the analyses that showed that this coronavirus genome contained sequences of another virus, … the HIV virus (AIDS virus), but they were forced to withdraw their findings as the pressure from the mainstream was too great.
>In a challenging question Dr Jean-François Lemoine inferred that the coronavirus under investigation may have come from a patient who is otherwise infected with HIV.
>"No," says Luc Montagnier, "in order to insert an HIV sequence into this genome, molecular tools are needed, and that can only be done in a laboratory."
...
I mean, I find it hard to believe, that all those medics and researchers, people with completely different views and backgrounds, would all be part of one and the same total lie, not just a scam, a pure invention, a myth
How do you explain that away?
we carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus,
That’s like saying I carefully analyzed the description of the genome of a unicorn. It doesn’t mean I’m observing a unicorn. The pictures we are shown look exactly like exosomes which are produced by our own bodies. The “discovery” of new viruses is simply the finding of bits of RNA and using extrapolation based on computer models to say that you’ve then sequences the genome. It doesn’t mean you’re observing a virus. They also claim they’re observing a virus killing cells when they’re simply observing cell death in a lab dish containing many compounds and chemicals.
Because of this year I now doubt viral theory in general. “Viruses” seem to be our cells’ own toxic excretions. Present in the setting of sickness, but not the cause of sickness.
If you haven’t checked out Dr Andrew Kaufman’s work this year he explains exosomes and how all assertions that a new virus has been isolated are doubtful.
“Medics” do not study viruses. Doctors do not go home at night and spend time at a microscope. There should have been massive large-scale testing at the rollout of the testing kits to verify that they actually work. If they could demonstrate the same coronavirus they claimed to discover this year in all of the tissue samples of all positive tests, which isn’t present in the bodies of negative testers, that would be actual convincing science. But it was never done of course, because it would have exposed the fraud of the testing kits which provide all the “case numbers.”
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/18/sars-cov-2-has-not-been-proven-to-exist/
(post is archived)