https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus#Infection_in_humans
>Coronaviruses vary significantly in risk factor. Some can kill more than 30% of those infected, such as MERS-CoV, and some are relatively harmless, such as the common cold.[50]
What about MERS? Is there any proof of its existence or does it also fail to show up when you actually look for proof of its existence?
Where I'm getting at, is that, why use a non existing virus while one could very well "update" an existing one? I mean it's more convincing when people actually get sick
Also there's this
>“With my colleague, bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez, we carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus,” explains Luc Montagnier, interviewed by Dr Jean-François Lemoine for the daily podcast at Pourquoi Docteur, adding that others have already explored this avenue:
>Indian researchers have already tried to publish the results of the analyses that showed that this coronavirus genome contained sequences of another virus, … the HIV virus (AIDS virus), but they were forced to withdraw their findings as the pressure from the mainstream was too great.
>In a challenging question Dr Jean-François Lemoine inferred that the coronavirus under investigation may have come from a patient who is otherwise infected with HIV.
>"No," says Luc Montagnier, "in order to insert an HIV sequence into this genome, molecular tools are needed, and that can only be done in a laboratory."
...
I mean, I find it hard to believe, that all those medics and researchers, people with completely different views and backgrounds, would all be part of one and the same total lie, not just a scam, a pure invention, a myth
How do you explain that away?
we carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus,
That’s like saying I carefully analyzed the description of the genome of a unicorn. It doesn’t mean I’m observing a unicorn. The pictures we are shown look exactly like exosomes which are produced by our own bodies. The “discovery” of new viruses is simply the finding of bits of RNA and using extrapolation based on computer models to say that you’ve then sequences the genome. It doesn’t mean you’re observing a virus. They also claim they’re observing a virus killing cells when they’re simply observing cell death in a lab dish containing many compounds and chemicals.
Because of this year I now doubt viral theory in general. “Viruses” seem to be our cells’ own toxic excretions. Present in the setting of sickness, but not the cause of sickness.
If you haven’t checked out Dr Andrew Kaufman’s work this year he explains exosomes and how all assertions that a new virus has been isolated are doubtful.
“Medics” do not study viruses. Doctors do not go home at night and spend time at a microscope. There should have been massive large-scale testing at the rollout of the testing kits to verify that they actually work. If they could demonstrate the same coronavirus they claimed to discover this year in all of the tissue samples of all positive tests, which isn’t present in the bodies of negative testers, that would be actual convincing science. But it was never done of course, because it would have exposed the fraud of the testing kits which provide all the “case numbers.”
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/18/sars-cov-2-has-not-been-proven-to-exist/
>Because of this year I now doubt viral theory in general.
Hm
https://poal.co/s/Science/213696
"Dr. Lanka proved in the highest court of the land that measles was not caused by a virus, & that there was ... no such thing as a measles virus"
http://www.integralworld.net/visser175.html
>Stefan Lanka, a molecular biologist by training, did his doctoral thesis and subsequent PhD—irony of ironies—on the viral infection in brown algae, but other than a few co-written articles he hasn't contributed anything in terms of scientific publications. Rather, he has been on a crusade against the idea of viruses (harmful or otherwise) for decades. In the nineties he argued that HIV did not exist. He vehemently debated with Peter Duesberg, another AIDS denialist, who at least believed in the existence of the HIV virus (but considered it a relatively harmless virus). A truly odd debate. A decade later Lanka wrote books in the same denialist spirit about the measles virus, the birds flue, AIDS and vaccination. He is owner of a publishing house Klein-klein Verlag and the magazin Wissenschaftplus.In 2015 he earned the "Goldenes Brett vorm Kopf" award, organized by the German skeptical society, which is given out for the "most amazing pseudo-scientific nonsense" of the year.
...
I don't rule out any possibility, as a principle, because well, shit keeps on delivering and never ceases to amaze when it comes to anything from this world
That being said... Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
Aside from andrew kauffman, is there other names claiming that it doesn't exist?
There is a 28 minute video going around with doctors saying there is no pandemic and they won’t be getting the vaccine.
https://odysee.com/@OracleFilms:1/Ask-The-Experts-(Covid-19-Vaccine):e
How many of them believe in the virus, I don’t know. Definitely not all of them.
But the extraordinary claim is that there is a new, deadly, unique, highly contagious viral pandemic. And there is not evidence for that.
I often use the legal principle of “fraud vitiates everything it touches” in other words if they’re lying about so many other aspects of the scam, I’m entitled to dismiss other claims without evidence.
At this point in the year I’ve seen much more evidence that coronahoax is entirely fake than actual evidence that it’s real, which has usually amounted to “I lost my sense of smell” and “this guy died.”
Thank you for quoting Dr Lanka. I wouldn’t have thought of him off the top of my head but he is one of the first names I came across earlier this year questioning viral theory.
Which reminds me that the man who invented the PCR process, Dr Kary Mullis, also denied the link between HIV and AIDS, and also called Fauci a liar and a fraud.
(post is archived)