we carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus,
That’s like saying I carefully analyzed the description of the genome of a unicorn. It doesn’t mean I’m observing a unicorn. The pictures we are shown look exactly like exosomes which are produced by our own bodies. The “discovery” of new viruses is simply the finding of bits of RNA and using extrapolation based on computer models to say that you’ve then sequences the genome. It doesn’t mean you’re observing a virus. They also claim they’re observing a virus killing cells when they’re simply observing cell death in a lab dish containing many compounds and chemicals.
Because of this year I now doubt viral theory in general. “Viruses” seem to be our cells’ own toxic excretions. Present in the setting of sickness, but not the cause of sickness.
If you haven’t checked out Dr Andrew Kaufman’s work this year he explains exosomes and how all assertions that a new virus has been isolated are doubtful.
“Medics” do not study viruses. Doctors do not go home at night and spend time at a microscope. There should have been massive large-scale testing at the rollout of the testing kits to verify that they actually work. If they could demonstrate the same coronavirus they claimed to discover this year in all of the tissue samples of all positive tests, which isn’t present in the bodies of negative testers, that would be actual convincing science. But it was never done of course, because it would have exposed the fraud of the testing kits which provide all the “case numbers.”
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/18/sars-cov-2-has-not-been-proven-to-exist/
>Because of this year I now doubt viral theory in general.
Hm
https://poal.co/s/Science/213696
"Dr. Lanka proved in the highest court of the land that measles was not caused by a virus, & that there was ... no such thing as a measles virus"
http://www.integralworld.net/visser175.html
>Stefan Lanka, a molecular biologist by training, did his doctoral thesis and subsequent PhD—irony of ironies—on the viral infection in brown algae, but other than a few co-written articles he hasn't contributed anything in terms of scientific publications. Rather, he has been on a crusade against the idea of viruses (harmful or otherwise) for decades. In the nineties he argued that HIV did not exist. He vehemently debated with Peter Duesberg, another AIDS denialist, who at least believed in the existence of the HIV virus (but considered it a relatively harmless virus). A truly odd debate. A decade later Lanka wrote books in the same denialist spirit about the measles virus, the birds flue, AIDS and vaccination. He is owner of a publishing house Klein-klein Verlag and the magazin Wissenschaftplus.In 2015 he earned the "Goldenes Brett vorm Kopf" award, organized by the German skeptical society, which is given out for the "most amazing pseudo-scientific nonsense" of the year.
...
I don't rule out any possibility, as a principle, because well, shit keeps on delivering and never ceases to amaze when it comes to anything from this world
That being said... Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
Aside from andrew kauffman, is there other names claiming that it doesn't exist?
There is a 28 minute video going around with doctors saying there is no pandemic and they won’t be getting the vaccine.
https://odysee.com/@OracleFilms:1/Ask-The-Experts-(Covid-19-Vaccine):e
How many of them believe in the virus, I don’t know. Definitely not all of them.
But the extraordinary claim is that there is a new, deadly, unique, highly contagious viral pandemic. And there is not evidence for that.
I often use the legal principle of “fraud vitiates everything it touches” in other words if they’re lying about so many other aspects of the scam, I’m entitled to dismiss other claims without evidence.
At this point in the year I’ve seen much more evidence that coronahoax is entirely fake than actual evidence that it’s real, which has usually amounted to “I lost my sense of smell” and “this guy died.”
Thank you for quoting Dr Lanka. I wouldn’t have thought of him off the top of my head but he is one of the first names I came across earlier this year questioning viral theory.
Which reminds me that the man who invented the PCR process, Dr Kary Mullis, also denied the link between HIV and AIDS, and also called Fauci a liar and a fraud.
Alright
So, let's say for the sake of the argument, that indeed, all this shit is fake, there's no virus
What would be the point, the goal? Mass sterilize/alter the dna of everybody with fake shots? Simulate how the world would react during a real pandemic? Provide cover for an imminent catastrophe and blame it on covid (debts)? Justify the implementation of new means of social control? Create a peter and the wolf situation so when the real shit kicks in people get fucked thinking it's fake again? A bundle of all this?
And again, why not release a super MERS instead, for real? I mean after all it would be even more convincing. Because it's not that easy to make a new virus that doesn't turn out to be a failure in about a couple of days due to bad mutations?
(post is archived)