I am sure he is a complete jew fabrication. Just like peace, waffles, and the female orgasm. Trying to keep us twisted up and confused. Man I love waffles
I apologize for being a smartass. There is enough of that already without my help. Even if he is a fabrication, the concepts he is credited have been implemented and extrapolated upon. The atomic clock is based upon the relativity of time and is currently used by whatever device you are reading this on.
The relativity work is a creative thought experiment on already proven (for 50 years before) formulas and academic ideas. It's more plausible that it's a creative story re-telling of the already proven formulas.
Kind of like the creative thought experiments of how the barber was forced to do nice haircuts on people only to trick them into chambers with wooden doors at a rate that would require teleportation to achieve. The story fits a pre-determined conclusion.
He wasn't a dum-dum, and his work on the photoelectric effect is decent (again, due to the creativity). However, the nobel prizes are simply an in-club money giveaway. Kind of like the acadamy awards ... if you don't fuck kids on camera or pimp yourself to the cabal, you don't get the roles, and won't win the award.
This lady here (youtube.com) mentions Einstein several times in her deposition - worth the watch regarding how mind control works in many organizations. I have heard other interesting arguments as well about who Einstein was. Here's another interesting expose (youtube.com) which was recommended to me. I haven't watched that one yet, but did look up the papers he didn't cite for the theory of relativity. There is pretty compelling evidence he's a well crafted fraud.
If you'd like to go further down the nuclear rabbit hole, then check out this (youtube.com) and this (ia803003.us.archive.org). I admit, this is an "itchy subject" and hard to believe, but the hoax may go deeper than a lot of people realize.
Thank you for the links. Good info and well laid out. I can agree he was a douchbag. The plagiarism issue has never been my battle. I have never been concerned so much with the messenger of any topic as I have with the message. The same accusations have been made about Martin l king jr. However if we throw out all information because it was delivered by a douchbag doing douchbag things, there would be no information. This includes my own opinions as I can very well be a douchbag. I also do not mean to imply that his message was correct. Nor anyone else's for that matter. My own included. Only that it is food for thought that if not considered and contemplated, then the advancement of such thoughts will be beyond us. Food for thought. That's all anything can be unless you subscribe to that thought, at which point we miss the rest. Just my thoughts tho. Thank you for the links and thoughts
(post is archived)