You know what I meant.
I'm pretty sure having a spelling or grammar mistake in the post title automatically invalidates your legal argument.
We're gonna need a ruling on this.
Technicalities may work in that other world ... but on Poal, we hold our users to no such restrictions. The message was clear enough to any user to understand it and that is my ruling ... therefore your legal argument is null and void.
Guilty
I appeal this ruling to the full court. @Slumsta @Owlchemy @Krier55 @AOU @Sporkulon
So did all of the court justices discuss this ruling in the 5 minutes it took you to answer this? Or do you make unilateral decisions for the court without consulting other justices?
I'm pretty sure LEGALLY there is no standing to any argument that contains a typo. I want to hear what the other justices have to say on the matter.
(post is archived)