Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

182

Yesterday, I was running my grandmother around for her errands. I was picking up some soil at Walmart (she insisted) and the radio host started talking about Sting and how he's not giving his kids anything when he dies.

According to the host, she quoted Sting saying "I'm not leaving my kids anything. They all have great work ethic, and it's a form of child abuse to say 'Oh, here's what I left you. You don't have to work if you don't want to.'"

She further went on to say with utter seriousness "It's such a, you know, great thing for a parent to do. Why don't they just give it all to charity, or, you know, spend it on themselves? Leaving it for the kids? That's just, I don't know, like you're babying them from beyond the grave. That's terrible to do to your kids, right?"

I sat there in silence for a moment as I just turned that over in my head in disbelief that they just up and said it out loud. It's evil.

Of course, my grandmother, who put herself over 40K in debt and has never been one to save anything or build anything even when she was younger (even back when my grandpa was alive and it was early in their marriage, she managed to drive our family to bankruptcy at least once and I know of 3 times in my 31 years of life she's done the same) just sat there in silence as I mumbled to myself about how evil and immoral the anti-inheritance people are.

Because we all know that the evil people pushing this on others aren't doing the same for themselves. No, they're hoarding it for their families, using unscrupulous practices to gather more and more, and no matter how they spend it they're never going to run out of money at this point.

While it's been more just a fact of life these last few decades that parents won't leave their kids or other family much, now they're trying to make it a righteous action to deliberately give them nothing and the kids should be happy about it. A sickening idea all around.

This is literally the first time I've heard it said out loud that "Leaving your kids nothing is a good thing," and on the radio of all places.

Yesterday, I was running my grandmother around for her errands. I was picking up some soil at Walmart (she insisted) and the radio host started talking about Sting and how he's not giving his kids anything when he dies. According to the host, she quoted Sting saying "I'm not leaving my kids anything. They all have great work ethic, and it's a form of child abuse to say 'Oh, here's what I left you. You don't have to work if you don't want to.'" She further went on to say with utter seriousness "It's such a, you know, great thing for a parent to do. Why don't they just give it all to charity, or, you know, spend it on themselves? Leaving it for the kids? That's just, I don't know, like you're babying them from beyond the grave. That's terrible to do to your kids, right?" I sat there in silence for a moment as I just turned that over in my head in disbelief that they just up and said it out loud. It's evil. Of course, my grandmother, who put herself over 40K in debt and has never been one to save anything or build anything even when she was younger (even back when my grandpa was alive and it was early in their marriage, she managed to drive our family to bankruptcy at least once and I know of 3 times in my 31 years of life she's done the same) just sat there in silence as I mumbled to myself about how evil and immoral the anti-inheritance people are. Because we all know that the evil people pushing this on others aren't doing the same for themselves. No, they're hoarding it for their families, using unscrupulous practices to gather more and more, and no matter how they spend it they're never going to run out of money at this point. While it's been more just a fact of life these last few decades that parents won't leave their kids or other family much, now they're trying to make it a righteous action to deliberately give them nothing and the kids should be happy about it. A sickening idea all around. This is literally the first time I've heard it said out loud that "Leaving your kids nothing is a good thing," and on the radio of all places.
[–] • 3 pts

Meanwhile, Jews start transferring large amounts of money to their children at age 13 during their Bar Mitzvahs so they can invest it and take advantage of compounding interest over time, and be financially ahead of 99% of Goyim by the time they turn 25.

[–] • 2 pts

I remember having a conversation with my father around when I graduated college. He was sort of lamenting that he couldn't have just written a check for my tution (I did have enough scholarships that I got out not too bad) and didn't have money to just set me up right out of school. He had bought me a car for graduation though. He said, "I didn't have the means to give you everything you probably, but I always tried to give you enough that your life was a little easier and little nicer than mine. I figured if I could do that than I could consider myself a success. And if someday you do the same for your children, and so on, well in a few generations the Circus family might really be something."

He was successful, After growing up solidly in the top of the bottom half of the middle class, I find myself living cleanly in the bottom of the top half of the half of the middle class.

I've kinda taken his thoughts to heart, and I spoil my child just enough that he has nice nicer things I didn't as a kid but wanted, but not overly so he still knows to appreciate things, and of course I'll have been able to tuck away money for a car or his school or whatever he needs to give him a real leg up when the time comes.

[–] • 2 pts

See, you and your dad get it. No one said jack about "spoiling" the kids, and I'd consider that another form of child abuse as well. But to deliberately leave them nothing, and to glorify it, to essentially spit on the concept of preparing the future generations entirely?

That's where I draw the line. Especially when we know those in power are laughing at us for doing so while they do the opposite.

Go on, have your cruises, buy that classic car that'll sit pretty in your garage except for 85+ degree days with sun and no wind. No one said you have to live like a miser just so your kids and grandkids can get everything. You do have the right to enjoy your life and use your money... but if you have any sense of love in your heart and for your family, leave something meaningful for your kids. Let them have a piece of your legacy to carry onwards and pass the torch to the next generation. Something tangible that will actually benefit them and their children, the entire family, for their future.

[–] • 2 pts

It might be just another chutzpah and an exploitation of a childishly naive form of the American dream, where parents "started with nothing" and their kids "must work hard to get it", or else it doesn't count. You've seen this a million times, it just feels better to be an underdog who had to crawl to the finish line by the skin of their teeth instead of being handed everything on a silver platter. The real life, however, will happily remind you that it doesn't care and gleefully smack your poor kid over the head, again and again, only causing more resentment. Especially when the rules and the environment has changed so much over the years.

No one's getting rewarded for playing "fair". See that rich shitskin, or a jew, or some mystery meat abomination? They keep their generational wealth. And they accumulate it, double it or triple it with each step, and never piss it away. They're so far ahead for it, it's completely out of the question. It's no longer the 1800s, everyone had over two centuries to accumulate their own wealth, and yet somehow the modern boomers expect their kids to "live in the dirt because that's how I did it". And so, paradoxically, Whites keep getting poorer despite working the hardest, while some monkey nogs who belong in a jungle and wouldn't see anything more advanced than a wheel in their lifetime own an entire garage of premium cars they flaunt on videos.

This is a sick mentality. Why is it that it's automatically assumed that your kid's going to be a spoiled stupid brat, the image of whom they kept hammering you over the head on all those jewish TV shows? This is wrong, it's false, it's another chutzpah. Your ancestors crawled so you could soar. They laid the foundation so you could have the freedom to decide what to do with it. That's the real American dream. Continue the old family business? Or start something new? Find a new passion without being constrained by trifling issues? Just imagine. This creates so many opportunities. That's what it's all about. Crawling in the dirt was so over long ago, that's yesterday's news. Your kids shouldn't be stuck working at deadbeat jobs until their 40s anymore.

Just to illustrate, let's say you played some kind of a videogame where you can inherit items from your old character, say, Diablo. In your first play, you struggled and you fought, and you got yourself a nice stash. Your next character can start over from zero, or he can be a nepobaby and use all that wealth to move ahead so much faster and achieve newer heights never seen before. That's still your own wealth, you're not stealing from anyone. Who is to say it's somehow evil or wrong? Only jews would seethe and kike over it, so let them. White people ought to use their strengths and fruits of their hard-earned labor to move forward, not the other way around.

[–] • 2 pts

I'm sorry to hear that. I hate the jews who are responsible for the brainwashing of our people.

[–] • 1 pt

I'm okay if my dad doesn't leave me anything. It would be nice, but I don't expect. My mom would leave me with debts. I've made my own way in this world, so handouts are not something I look forward to, rather they are a blessing if it happens.

[–] • 1 pt

I've heard it from Boomers. I've also heard them say they didn't think that until the internet brought out all the "OK Boomer" and straight up blaming everything wrong on them. So they said, fine, if you want to hate on me and be disrespectful, I'll spend as much as I want, I earned it, I worked hard, I didn't get some huge inheritance, I'll spend as much as I want and do all the things I wanted to do and you can have the scraps left over....Not saying that I agree with that but Millennials got ruined as the everybody gets a trophy generation. The real world doesn't hand things to you and they directed their collective hate towards Boomers.

[–] • 3 pts

Eh, combined with the "kick them out of the house at 18" and "Pull yourself up by the bootstraps" phenomenon, combined with refusing to acknowledge that the world they grew up in and the world we (I'd say from late 80's/early 90's onward at the earliest as a best estimate) live in is radically different really contributed to the "ok boomer" mentality.

What's the point in building up anything real if you're not going to pass it on to your kids/family? And framing it as abusive to leave it is magnitudes worse as well.

"What kind of father is it that gives his son a serpent when his son asks for a fish?"

[–] • 0 pt

I don't know what sting is worth, or how many kids he has, but this seems like a fine thing at a certain point of wealth. I'd imagine his kids are already set up in a comfortable life. Now what Yoko did to Sean Lennon, there's a shitty way to treat someone.