Poal is the only place that actually let's me post stuff

1.4K

•

I'm shadowbanned or out right banned everywhereeeeeee.

Everything I say is deeply upsetting to gaywads I guess.

So the latest thing I tried to say was a response to this post on normiebook. Someone said George Lucas seemed kinda sketchy. So I tried to link and quote this one article:

https://www.insidehook.com/film/indiana-jones-pedophile

The transcript of the 1978 story meetings for the film between George Lucas, Steven Spielberg and Lawrence Kasdan reveal that the three men considered making Marion as young as 11 at the time of her “affair” with the action hero. Check out a snippet of that conversation below:

Lawrence Kasdan: I like it if they already had a relationship at one point. Because then you don’t have to build it.

George Lucas: I was thinking that this old guy could have been [her] mentor. He could have known this little girl when she was just a kid. Had an affair with her when she was eleven.

Kasdan: And he was forty-two.

Lucas: He hasn’t seen her in twelve years. Now she’s twenty-two. It’s a real strange relationship.

Spielberg: She had better be older than twenty-two.

Lucas: He’s thirty-five, and he knew her ten years ago when he was twenty-five and she was only twelve.

Lucas: It would be amusing to make her slightly young at the time.

Spielberg: And promiscuous. She came onto him.

Lucas: Fifteen is right on the edge. I know it’s an outrageous idea, but it is interesting. Once she’s sixteen or seventeen it’s not interesting anymore. But if she was fifteen and he was twenty-five and they actually had an affair the last time they met.

The whole thing is vile. It’s victim-blaming at its worst. (We’re really going to call a 12-year-old kid “promiscuous” and go with the idea that “she came onto him” to explain why our hero was engaged in some sort of physical relationship with her when she was still potentially too young to have even gotten her first period?) Note how Lucas asserts that her being 16 or 17 “isn’t interesting anymore”; the implication is that so many full-grown men were sleeping with underage teenagers back then that it’d be too boring unless her character was made to be even younger.

I'm preaching to the choir by telling you guys stuff but I can't say anything any place else.

I'm shadowbanned or out right banned everywhereeeeeee. Everything I say is deeply upsetting to gaywads I guess. So the latest thing I tried to say was a response to this post on normiebook. Someone said George Lucas seemed kinda sketchy. So I tried to link and quote this one article: https://www.insidehook.com/film/indiana-jones-pedophile >The transcript of the 1978 story meetings for the film between George Lucas, Steven Spielberg and Lawrence Kasdan reveal that the three men considered making Marion as young as 11 at the time of her “affair” with the action hero. Check out a snippet of that conversation below: >Lawrence Kasdan: I like it if they already had a relationship at one point. Because then you don’t have to build it. >George Lucas: I was thinking that this old guy could have been [her] mentor. He could have known this little girl when she was just a kid. Had an affair with her when she was eleven. >Kasdan: And he was forty-two. >Lucas: He hasn’t seen her in twelve years. Now she’s twenty-two. It’s a real strange relationship. >Spielberg: She had better be older than twenty-two. >Lucas: He’s thirty-five, and he knew her ten years ago when he was twenty-five and she was only twelve. >Lucas: It would be amusing to make her slightly young at the time. >Spielberg: And promiscuous. She came onto him. >Lucas: Fifteen is right on the edge. I know it’s an outrageous idea, but it is interesting. Once she’s sixteen or seventeen it’s not interesting anymore. But if she was fifteen and he was twenty-five and they actually had an affair the last time they met. >The whole thing is vile. It’s victim-blaming at its worst. (We’re really going to call a 12-year-old kid “promiscuous” and go with the idea that “she came onto him” to explain why our hero was engaged in some sort of physical relationship with her when she was still potentially too young to have even gotten her first period?) Note how Lucas asserts that her being 16 or 17 “isn’t interesting anymore”; the implication is that so many full-grown men were sleeping with underage teenagers back then that it’d be too boring unless her character was made to be even younger. I'm preaching to the choir by telling you guys stuff but I can't say anything any place else.