WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Now don't get me wrong. If you own a bunch of rentals that cash flow gives you freedom (although that is a lot to lose!). In most cases though. I find this statement to be true.

Now don't get me wrong. If you own a bunch of rentals that cash flow gives you freedom (although that is a lot to lose!). In most cases though. I find this statement to be true.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

The problem with this message is that someone will own the things that others don't. If you don't own the land, someone else will. That's not freedom at all. Without ownership, you will be a serf to the owners of the land, property and goods. Ownership gives you freedom by providing you with a bargaining chip and leverage against those who would seek to have what you own.

I dismiss your message as it aligns too much with the jew agenda of us owning nothing and them owning everything. The more I own, the greater my freedom because I get to control part of that equation. I will not give that up and become a serf to the kikedom.

[–] 0 pt

I own my home but do I?

Property taxes say otherwise.

[–] 3 pts

This just sounds like "you will own nothing and you will be happy" to me.

[–] 1 pt

I don't think you should "own nothing." Unless you're willing to go live a vagabond lifestyle (not realistic for most people who want a family and etc) you'll just endlessly be enriching others (mostly (((you know who))) ) through rentals.

Better plan for freedom is buy stuff that doesn't tie you to anything. The (((bank))) might tell you that you can afford X amount for a mortgage. But if X keeps you dependent on a specific job working for someone else to pay for it you don't want it, that makes you a serf. Same for cars and other big expenses.

Instead buy cars in cash and a house that you could afford working for yourself if you had to, even if you have a good job you like and have no intention of working for yourself. It gives you the freedom to know you could say, "fuck it Im out," if you wanted to.

Over time you'll build up equity it the house and can always use that to move up later to something bigger / nicer that will still leave you in a position that you know you still could afford to chuse out of the system on if you wanted

Same princeple with cars. Yes, unlike your house they will lose value over time instead of appreciate. But if it took you three years to save to buy a 20k car in cash today, three years from now saving the same will allow you to move up to a nicer car. No, your car won't sell for 20k, but it will sell for a lot more than zero. If we guess at 20% deprecistion a year for a car, that still now leaves you three years lster in a position to buy a 30k car in cash and move up in comfort.

(((The bank))) doesn't want you to think like that though. They want you not to have saved, take a loan for a 20k car today, pay $30k for it over the life of a five year loan, then have seen your $20k car fall to <7k value and now take another loan for a $27k car where with inflation factored in you've hardly moved up at all.

[–] 0 pt

Over time you'll build up equity it the house

Depends on when you bought you bought and how much you put down. I bet there are still people underwater from pre 2008 crash.

I do own my own home and car outright though so I get what you're staying.

[–] 0 pt

Freedom’s just another word for nothin left to lose. -Kris Kristofferson

The original message is drastically different from that of the talentless nigger lover who would later record her own version “Me and Bobby McGee.”

Kristofferson’s version is about loss and sorrow, he starts with only the love of a woman, and ends as even she departs, to this refrain.

It isn’t to be celebrated. It isn’t to be aspired toward.

[–] 0 pt

The tale of a kike trying to serfherd landing only liberal demonrat minded npcs.